OK, CalifBoomer, you got me.

Really? I hadn’t noticed. Yes, there are some leftists here, and I’d go so far as to say a few of them are pretty hardcore, but anti-theistic? Where do you see people who oppose all theistic religions? I haven’t seen any as long as I’ve been here. On the other hand, I’ve seen plenty of theists who oppose all forms of non-theism… Furthermore, there are actually some conservatives here. And I, despite being a raving pinko, get along with them!!! This is because they, unlike you, are not jerks.

Now, a few selected remarks from the AA thread:

On some of the Founding Fathers not being Christian:

You’ve just earned your ignorant badge there, pal. Where were you during American History? If I didn’t believe that you dismiss anything that doesn’t agree with your point of view with some ad hominem attacks, I do now.

On Larry Borgia’s post “at the risk of going off topic, how is “atheistic liberalism” a biological error?”:

And there you earn your troll badge.

On his opponents:

No comment necessary.

CalifBoomer, you have nothing to contribute here. You are not here to fight ignorance, except ignorance as defined as “anything I disagree with”. You claim to respect the rules of debate, but as soon as your position becomes tenuous, the rulebook goes right out the window. You can dish it out, but you cannot take it. I have not had much to do with you in the past, but I have been following threads you are participating in, and I, for one, have had enough. My fool filter has been activated. CalifBoomer no longer exists.


Heck is where you go when you don’t believe in Gosh.

Spare me. You are inevitably the first to start name-calling and mud-slinging.

Several people have commented to me that I am the most patient here with you, but I have to say it’s wearing thin (and you’re certainly not the only person on this board I vehemently disagree with, but you are the only person I’ve ever flipped off at). Am I going to flat-out ignore you? No, probably not. But please tell me you notice that when you post in a rational, intelligent manner, people respond to you in kind (as evidenced in the “Ask The Gay Guy” thread), but when you spew vitriolic, people also respond in kind to that?

Oh, wait, you’re saying that most people don’t, that they jump all over you no matter how rationally you post? Well, considering that your venom outweighs your honey by about 100 to 1, do you blame them?

I maintain that you can disagree without being disagreeable.

Esprix


Ask the Gay Guy! (or, if you prefer the Jesusfied version, Asketh the damn Priest Guy!)

hey!!! i resent that…(or something like that)

way to go califboomer!

bj0rn - mö

Hm. . .anyone here think I have ever been even remotely as rude as Cauliflower Bloomers? Do I seem easily offended? I am thinking that your pigheadedness read only the recent thread about NAs destroying the environment, in which yes, I did take offense to Mr.Z’s racism. Other than that, I tend to not take offense until someone repeatedly attacks me seemingly without merit. But I wouldn’t expect you to understand that, I mean, it must be pretty hard to see and hear with your head jammed so far up your ass.

Fuckface.


Rather, I was in the position of a spore which, having finally accepted its destiny as a fungus, still wonders if it might produce penicillin.
–Ayi Kwei Armah

Apple, you don’t have to justify yourself to the little prick. You contribute, he trolls.

If we make him invisible, he’ll be talking to himself.

Not justifying Wally, just sharpening up my rude sarcasm skills. How’d I do? I really loved the line about having his head up his ass. :slight_smile:


Rather, I was in the position of a spore which, having finally accepted its destiny as a fungus, still wonders if it might produce penicillin.
–Ayi Kwei Armah

You lightweight fuckwits. I can give you a resentment that will last into the middle of next month, without even trying. Look at poor, pitiful Wally. I have never said a rude or unkind thing to him. Yet he runs from thread to thread, seething with anger, posting puny epithets. If this is not the definition of trolling, what is?

Get a clue. Your cowardly leader has abandoned you, and is off somewhere eating his own excrement. Since I’m not inclined to babysit you, entertain yourselves Here until your mommies come home.

::

It figures that his favorite web site would involve self-abuse.


Eagles may soar free and proud, but weasels never get sucked into jet engines.

Boomer, I tried to make a few semi-rational observations in my post to you, and all you can do is respond like that?

Doesn’t that tell you something?

Esprix


Ask the Gay Guy! (or, if you prefer the Jesusfied version, Asketh the damn Priest Guy!)

Hm, this description sounds familliar, who do I know that matches it? Hm…give me a couple minutes will you?

Please do. I collect resentments. Then I mount them under glass and display them in museums. It’s quite a lucrative business actually.

My, it’s become quite a fad amoung the trolls to attack Wally, hasn’t it. He should probably be flattered by this.

Er, can you provide some sort of citation? Liker perhaps something you said to him that wasn’t?

Didn’t think so.

Hm, theres that feeling of familiarity. Who do I know who does this…

Wait, I’ve got it!

It’s CalifBoomer. Don’t worry though, it’s not a big deal Calif. I’m always mistaking you and Wally too.
:rolleyes:

I do believe theres a thread that addresses this very issue actually.

Oh, and because this is the pit.

Fuck Off

…For the glory of Ed Zotti.