Gawker has been running a pretty interesting series of stories about Fox News chief Roger Ailes and the small newspapers he owns in Putnam County, N.Y. The first one talked about he had some reporters followed, because he feared they were talking smack about him.
Anyway, the latest story details his feud with a rival newspaper publisher in Putnam County.
Here’s Ol’ Roger’s response:
Just how insecure does one need to be to gloat about being able to knock over an 80-year-old.
Oh, he probably was insulting the guy in a not-so-back handed way by exaggerating his frailty. That’s still not gloating over his ability to knock the guy over, since it has nothing to do with his own ability, and everything to do with the other guy’s frailty.
Still pretty weak stuff (pardon the pun). But hey, whatever sets off your outrage meter…
Sounds to me like Ailes lost his temper, laid hands on (one finger on) an elderly, frail man, and then tried to defend himself by pointing out that only a bullying idiot would ever assault someone so much older and frailer than himself–so therefore he couldn’t possibly have done such a thing.
Be better for him if he didn’t already have a reputation as a bullying idiot, of course.
So Hall said Allies pushed him and Allies said he didn’t even poke him.
This happened supposedly at an expo so it’s quite possible there were others around.
I don’t see any evidence to support either of their claims.
So besides the opinion that Allies is already and asshole why do you believe one side of this situation and not the other?
I guess I should posted some more details about the feud in my OP, because him poking or not poking Hall isn’t even really the point of the story (I posted my little quip at the end as sort of an afterthought). The point is Ailes getting upset over this guy mentioning an unfavorable story about him in his paper and then threatening to sue him and making ominous threats about how he “knew things,” which is mentioned further down in story.
Here’s another tidbit from that article:
Anyway, the story then goes on to detail Ball’s feud with Hall, and Ailes’ support of him.
So it’s not really about “Ailes getting upset over this guy mentioning an unfavorable story about him in his paper and then threatening to sue him and making ominous threats about how he ‘knew things,’”, it’s about Ailes and the guy fighting over business, and Ailes’s newspaper trying to be the only one who can print official county announcements. It seems to me that’s a perfectly good thing for two newspaper owners to fight about.