I’m pretty sure they’re not too concerned about blood loss after a beheading…
From BijouDrain’s link:
So blood loss isn’t important from a medical standpoint in a beheading, but it seems to be a consideration from an aesthetic POV.
Somewhere here, there is a quality of life joke, but I just can’t find it.
I have another related question. Suppose you were sentenced to the stocks in medieval Britain. What could the general public do to you? Were there any limits? Could you be stabbed, murdered etc?
This is a highly topical question, as there are some people involved in stocks here in the US right now who should be punished by the general public.
Hmmm… This is interesting. Is the wording “…his hand shall be chopped off”, which it would have been, or “…he shall lose the use of that hand”?
I mean, when you refer to the team of doctors who are there to “patch the miscreant back together again”, I assume you mean that they treat the stump. But since limb reattachment surgery is fairly common nowadays, is there anything forbidding a suitably financed offender who’s been sentenced to an amputation in Saudi Arabia to having his own team of surgeons on call to immediately sew his hand back on?
And is there a penal difference for the right/left hand? Does it depend on the severity of the crime and whether the person in question is right- or left-handed?
The stock restrains the feet and was generally reserved for relatively benign crimes. The pillory restrains the hands, often the head, and occasionally the feet as well. It was reserved for more offensive crimes. You could expect to have things thrown at you and not being able to dodge them or block them (unlike someone in the stocks). So, yeah, being seriously injured, permanently maimed, or stoned to death could be possible.
If it’s any indication of what they’d allow passersby to do to you, according to a tour of a torture museum I took about ten years ago in Germany, women were not to be pilloried except for prostitution or adultery. I think you can figure that one out.
They take the left hand the first time. SUpposedly some people then lose their right hand.
But if you got caught doing the raping, you would still be punished, right? I think the question was how much they could legally get away with in front of everyone.
Valete,
Vox Imperatoris
Depends what you mean by “in front of everyone”. If everyone knows it happens and “everyone” doesn’t do anything to prevent it, you’re getting away with it in front of everyone, IMO.
I couldn’t tell you if people stood watch to protect pilloried whores or if there were rape-the-guy-in-the-pillory parties. It probably varied from town to town and whether people thought you were worth keeping healthy.
Edit: Buggery might be frowned upon, but I doubt you’d get in much trouble for raping a pilloried woman. That’s effectively why they were put there.
Well, no one really cares if you rape someone in a prison (an abhorrent situation), but you still get in trouble if you’re “occupied” while the guard walks by.