Some things just won’t stay buried. 
So far it’s only an alleged transcript. If the audio is actually released the poop will hit the fan.
I know, it’s The Enquire. But even they wouldn’t risk a multimillion dollar lawsuit unless theres a tape. Would they? Especially now with Hillary so popular. The major news networks will probably ignore the story unless the tape is released.
So Bill doesn’t enjoy watching a lady disrobe and do naughty things? Thats a odd quote.
No, it’s not “The Enquire”, it’s the fricking National Enquirer !!!
Don’t hide your sources. Bear the shame.
I still can’t give a shit about this.
ETA: Not intending to threadshit, exactly, but I don’t think any sane person doubts an adult intern willingly fellated Mr. Clinton. Even if there were a video of the event, complete with him smearing his wang with ultra rare Andean grape jelly for her enjoyment, I don’t think it matters now, nor did it while he was president. Dude got a sloppy hummer from an intern. He wasn’t the first and he won’t be the last.
Same thing Enquirer or National Enquirer. Most people use the shorter name.
Heck the source is right in the Radar article. The Enquirer has actually broke a few legit stories over the years. It’s a tabloid, but three weeks from now don’t be surprised if CNN is covering the newly released Monica audio tape story.
The Weiner sex scandal is causing the news to look at his wife’s dear friend and employer, Hillary. So yes, Bill’s affair with Monica is relevant again.
But not “The Enquire.”
Honestly, I don’t care about Clinton or Weiner’s sexual proclivities as I am not planning on dating them any time soon.
A typo. 
The edit window is long past. Can’t be fixed now.
No they don’t. MOST people don’t bother quoting the National Enquirer.
No, it’s not. Is anyone questioning Hilary’s credentials and experience because she is friends with someone whose husband is a douchebag? That’s like three degrees of separation from Weiner’s wiener.
I must be too stupid to connect the dots, please bear with me. Bill getting a hummer (adversely) affected him meeting the demands of his job as president, how? And his wife’s association with a guy who is clearly having some deep mental issues is relevant in what way to her husband’s misdeeds? I’m all confused. Are you suggesting Hillary has the power to make men act irresponsibly? Because that’s the only way I can see to link Bill’s shenanigans to Anthony’s.
A couple of embarassing amateurs. Now JFK, he knew how to screw around!
I know whenever I hear of someone behaving badly the first thing I think is, “There’s something hinky with the employer of the spouse of the badly behaved.”
Bill was the original Comeback Kid that saved his campaign with a famous 60 Minutes interview that included Hillary defending him. (this was the Paula Jones scandal)
Right or wrong, the news is comparing Huma’s defense of Weiner to Bill and Hillary.
I actually liked Bill and feel he was a good President. Weiner is… a Dick. 
The Clintons need to distance themselve from Huma fast. Before more damage is done.
No, it was Gennifer Flowers.
Ok, I got my ladies mixed up. Paula Jones, Jennifer Flowers and then Monica. Thankfully no new names have surfaced since he left office.
Anyway, I got a bad feeling more old Monica material may surface. The Clintons have a lot of enemies that smell blood in the water.
Echoing The Great Sun Jester– There’s nothing new here.
Flowers was the one who went public during his first campaign. Jones sued Clinton a few years later and the Lewinsky thing was disclosed as part of her lawsuit. And I think you’ve misunderstood what happened here:
It sounds like this person wanted some money. Doesn’t have to be an enemy of the Clinton’s and I don’t know what blood is supposed to be in the water - they’re both very popular.
And anything they bring up that isn’t roundly laughed at will backfire on them for exposing their meanspiritedness - just like every other time they’ve tried it.
So I have a *good *feeling more will surface. 
I have every confidence in Hillary’s ability to eliminate any trace and memory of blood from the pool when it pleases her to do so. Bill I liked becaused he was too cute and sweet–Family Guy nailed him. Hillary is no less charming, but it is because she appeals to my love for darker, Machiavellian practicality. There is of course no evidence to back that statement up, which only increases my regard for her.
Seriously, I can’t see these 20-year-old revelations having an impact on anyone. I’m on the opposite side from most of the people in this thread, in that the original scandal completely destroyed my respect for both Bill and Hillary. But it’s not like new information is going to make me any less likely to support them. I can’t see someone who was fine with Bill’s actions at the time being less fine with them because of this either.
Whenever people have tried to take down Clinton, it has never gone well. For the person or persons who attempted to take him down.
But nobody has any motive here except selling more Enquires.