Omnibus Stupid MFers in the news thread (Part 1)

I thought that was a “shamwow”? A shaman can be a respected religious person.

A shamwow is valuable, it can polish your car for example. That loser is not.

My statement bears the implication that religion is primarily bullshit.

Don’t you mean a chamois? Which kind of brings us full circle back to the fur hat with horns “shaman”.

He’s just a sham. He’s a travesty of a mockery of a sham of a mockery of a travesty of two mockeries of a sham.

He’s the shammiest shaman to ever sham. Shammy McScamface.

A Shamwow is a cloth version of a chamois. They used to be sold on infomercials by a really obnoxious huckster named Vince. Since the fur hat with horns dude is also an obnoxious huckster we’ve come full circle all over again.

You can use both a chamois and a Shamwow to polish your car but I wouldn’t let that sham of a shameful shaman anywhere near it.

This guy.

And he can stay away from my car too.

I remember Shamwow … I was alluding to the horned goat-antelope called the chamois :smiley: But your word play is pure poetry!

It’s almost sham-eful how easy it is to roll my eyes at the Qanon guy.

That sham shaman’s shilly chapeau might make a shatisfactory shim, though.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/tennessee-gov-transgenders-participating-in-women-s-sports-will-destroy-women-s-sports/ar-BB1dA7m0?ocid=Peregrine

Like this asshole gives a rat’s ass about women’s sports.

Candidate for Idiot of the Year!

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/michigan-senate-leader-on-hot-mic-after-apologizing-for-calling-capitol-riot-a-hoax-i-don-t-take-back-points-i-was-trying-to-make/ar-BB1dA7Lo?ocid=Peregrine

While your sibilance is undoubtedly excellent, am I the only one who thinks the focus on his hat keeps people from realizing how weird his pants are? They’re like some weird velour pull-up things, with the waist rolled under. And he seems to wear them all the time as part of his costume.

“That’s been a hoax from day one, that was all pre-arranged,” Shirkey said, asserting that rioters “went in on separate buses, that was all arranged by somebody that was funding everyone.”

Why is it always “buses”? Like there’s no way we could have infiltrated Fake Trumpers into a public protest without busing them all in. Why do they always fall back on this ridiculous claim?

Mots republicans are not smart enough to get around DC by bus.

They kind of look like “deerskin” chaps. Are there any shots from – no, on second thought, I do not want to see.

Nice recovery there, Ace. And not a syllable too soon. :wink:

No, they’re definitely pants, just not pants as we know them.

I’ve got a horrible conviction that he’s going commando under those things, too.

Aaand now I need some brain bleach…