He’s currently making a valuable contribution to the ACA discussion with a revolutionary insight into medicine. Apparently what Obamacare needs to have, but utterly fails to provide, is a dirt-cheap insurance plan that only provides stitches. Nothing else is really needed because, like, we’re all gonna die anyway, right? The great thing about this idea is that it also makes medical school quick and easy, as it can be combined with the girls’ high school sewing class and you get your MD in about an hour with full qualifications in general surgery, with a spool of thread and sewing needle included as a bonus. I have no ETA on the ban-hammer, but there’s only so much out-of-the-box innovative thinking we can handle here.
Wolfpoops contributions are no better in this thread
Why GMO labeling is a good idea
Care to be more specific than that?
John, I think you need to keep in mind the source of that comment. This is the genius who raised the fascinating question about whether consciousness lives in the quantum state after death, assuring us that “its [sic] important to keep an open mind until all the evidence comes in” and therefore pseudo-scientific babble from a sci-fi website peddling pure woo must be accorded the greatest import. And maybe Hitler is still alive. We’re dealing with an intellectual and scientific powerhouse here, and if the preceding isn’t convincing enough, further examples of his scientific depth and eclecticism abound: Do animal butts itch after pooping?. This is obviously no mere dilettante but one of the deepest thinkers of our generation.
I skimmed the threads and didn’t see anything obvious, and assumed that poster was just pissed at you for some reason. Maybe I wasn’t clear, but that was just my way of saying “put up or shut up”.
Over here he is waxing stupid. He asserts that the military can remove the President from office. Mind you, that’s not the only thing wrong with that post; it’s just the most egregious.
Here’s a new one.… Or actually probably an old one, as he has the exact same style, right down to the lower case “lol” at the end of his posts.
I’m guessing stinky sock.
I wonder if Snowboarder Bo still has his thingamajiggy to translate “lol” into “let’s go down to the quarry and throw shit down there”? Because after Calico Jerk and his apparent new crusty sock that’s gotta be one shit filled quarry by now.
femmejean starts a thread in GD: “Why are unusual kinks and sexual fetishes considered ‘highly arousing’?”
And I get a definite whiff from new poster “MisterX” there, too…
femmejean again with Loni Bouchard; babysitter who is a female pedophile…
From context, I can’t tell if he’s for pedo babysitters or against them though.
Nah man…You don’t get it.
I’m torn between crossroads of ‘Why am I so undesirable as a non masculine, minority male that an attractive older woman would pursue me’ and anger at the feminist rhetoric by men and women shouting ‘Male Privilege!’ when it’s clear that sexual crimes committed by men against children would almost certainly have him beaten alive either by parents, prisoners, or random citizens.
Can someone explain what this word salad means? Do you need a doctorate in femmejean to read it, or is a master or bachelor sufficient? Not that I’m interested in pursuing either.
Attractive older women have always pursued non masculine, minority males. Are you just learning this now?
For someone not interested in sex, you show an unhealthy obsession with the subject.
Get laid, or find another hobby.
I read that like five times and the best I could come up with was:
Older attractive females love effeminate males. Which somehow equates to male privilege.
Ah I see. Are you a Hindu? Because maybe I might want to hear about this in the next life. I’ll get back to you.
I think you’re torn btwn Dominos and Papa John’s.
He’s for them… especially the ones with smooth, creamy skin and big brown eyes. Especially if they’re willing to share their… um… brownness with him. 
I think this image says it all
Eh?