The Pit reveals character. The fact that you need the threat of banning to pass as a somewhat civil toad in other forums implies you only restrain your ugliness out of fear. You are a sad, lonely man aren’t you?
P.s. obviously fishing for a coveted “Pottymouth!!1!” doesn’t work. No sir.
The Doork is at it again in the alternate ending to “big” thread. He revived it just to say “but what if everybody involved with making the film is wrong???”. He isn’t bringing up any “what if” or “maybe” that hasn’t already been debunked over and over again.
Of course it reveals character, while I can not answer for others, I have answered to guys like you with no bad words in this thread; as noted before, it is clear that you have no intention whatsoever to acknowledge the trolling activities that a lot of the right are resorting to here and elsewhere in the SDMB no matter if there is no ugliness in a reply, because trolls do not have good arguments to make as a result of the president being the king of the trolls.
Did I claim to be a free speech absolutist? Perhaps I did but I can’t recall doing so. I am in favor of people being able to say most anything. However, libel and slander are actually an important exemption.
Who are the so-called right wing trolls on this site?
everyone = three people, two of which would have no clue about it (actors not on set). You know nothing about the art of making cinema. I was merely positing that given the circumstances, it is not entirely unpossible a scene shot by the second crew made its way onto the TV edit of a film, and a novice director not recalling that scene.
Funny you have to come here to rebut instead of there- we cant debate properly without working blue, is it? The cesspit, the last refuge of the dimwitted and linguistically challenged! No worries, I can do both.