To be fair, it appears that he has two jet fuel theories - one that it wouldn’t ignite outside a jet engine and another that it would have burned up so quickly without containment that it wouldn’t have caused any damage.
And each is dumber than the last.
At least he didn’t think the plane would bounce off or shatter into a billion pieces like the last lunatic did.
I’d refer to him as the previous lunatic. Sadly, neither of them will be the last lunatic here.
LAZ-boi still hasn’t stated his own theory of the events of 9/11, has he? Just “jet fuel doesn’t burn”, but no “it was the CIA”, right?
Nope, but I like the guys style.
Of course you would deny it.
I’d just like to say that I for one appreciated the Highlander reference.
Because it’s not me.
But I do appreciate the lil obsession and stalker-esque response my mere presence is generating.
Annoyed is fond of calling people stalkers. More projection, perhaps?
Which is ironic coming from you, considering you have made a point to hang off of my balls, constantly, even though you’ve been wrong about me, constantly.
As for me, I’m willing to accept it as a possibility, even a likelihood, that Annoyed is NOT a trock.
It is important to note that this is in no way intended to imply that he is an asset to the Doper community.
Unlike you, I have a functioning memory and, yes, a sense of decency. Of course I’m not stalking you. You just happened to be posting on, get this, a public message board. Care to take a wild guess what that implies, you fucking moronic liar?
When nobody buys your bullshit, it might be time to get out of the fertilizer business.
Why are you so angry? You came out of the gate raging, calling me a liar, linking to threads across several other unlinked threads trying to make my awesome self look bad and all this rage and anger has done nothing but make you look like an angry fool with a micro-penis who’s wrong all the time.
Aren’t you supposed to be in the “Tolerant & Inclusive” club? You’re acting like a bigot.
Again, not angry. Just not impressed by you. And you’re calling me a bigot? One would tend to think you do not know what the word means.
To foster a tolerant and inclusive environment one has to be intolerant of intolerance. Like people who use your kind of dumbass arguments.
It’s not rocket science, and yet the “Intolerant & exclusive” club keep pulling this out like it’s any sort of ‘gotcha’.
Sounds like a bullshit justification used by smug fuckheads for being smug, vengeful fuckheads.
From my perspective it sure seems to me that a lot of you guys are just intolerant of anything and anyone who doesn’t think and believe the same way you do, which is kind of funny because on the whole, most of the opinions on here are pretty fringe.
I know, right?
I mean there really isn’t anything wrong with declawing cats is there?
CMC fnord!
Nope. It’s mainstream. It’s call the paradox of tolerance. It even has a Wikipedia page.
I keep that page saved in my bookmarks to show anyone who thinks this is some fringe or new idea. You haven’t somehow cracked the code that turns the anti-bigots into the “true bigots.”
The concept of tolerance inherently must end before it gets to the point of tolerating intolerance. Those who are pro-tolerance and anti-bigotry can’t tolerate bigotry, as that defeats the entire purpose. If we tolerate bigotry, then we can’t stop it.