Once again, a pitting of our local pseudo-scientific racialists

I just see him as closely related to the Great Galactic Inquisitor from The Venture Brothers.

:stuck_out_tongue:

I personally don’t care what he calls it; if he’s happy being my goofy clown punching bag, I am too. They rarely talked back to me either when I was a kid. Just rocked back and forth with the same stupid expression on their face while I punched and punched. You’d think it would get old eventually, but it never did.

The “dishonesty” for which I am being punished (and how cruel and unusual a punishment it is— somewhere between the Comfy Chair and detention in a toy store) was an unwillingness to accompany b84 on one of his frequent and interminable red herring expeditions. One of the many occasions when he pulled his underwear over his head and went into Socratard mode, confident of his ability to distill a complex issue down into a single yes-or-no “gotcha” question if only humored a few hundred times.

He is clearly a person with many problems, one of which is a mistaken perception that he is much smarter than he is. The rest of his issues either derive directly from, or are exacerbated by that unfortunate failing.

It’s a nice, simple hypothesis. Where’s your genetic evidence that it’s actually correct? Oh, that’s right. You have none that hasn’t been discredited. Sorry, your conception of Occam’s Razor ain’t the way it actually works.

Ummm… Cite?

But you want to portray genes as of paramount importance, and insist that environment isn’t very explanatory. Ok, where’s your evidence…

Oh, that’s right. You have none. Oh, well. I guess I’m going to join your ‘ignore list’, now.

:rolleyes: Dumbass.

Well what do you mean by “genetic evidence”?

Are you insisting that I point to a specific gene, just like a tobacco executive might insist on being shown the specific genes involved cigarette smoking and lung cancer?

What exactly is wrong with my conception?

I will try to find a cite for you. First, please represent to me that you are seriously skeptical of the claim that blacks were more violent than whites at that time.

No, I claim that the observed racial gap in intelligence is due in large part to genetics. Do you disagree with this?

On the contrary, there is overwhelming evidence to support my position. Do you disagree with my position?

If you insist on misrepresenting my position, then of course you will.

Don’t worry- he’s not actually ignoring anyone.

You’re drunk, aren’t you?

Let’s keep your mother’s sex life out of this, ok?

I certainly am. I’d also be interested in the massive amounts of unreported white-on-black crime at the time, especially in the South.

Lol, no. But let’s assume for the sake of argument that I’m completely hammered.

And what exactly would be “the latest Liberal Social Program to Close the Gap”? Ain’t heard of a new one in a long, long time.

It’s alright to be racist, as long as you don’t talk about it, and people don’t suspect anything.

FWIW I don’t engage with this poster because of his past dishonesty.

Ah, now I recall, you’re the one who goes around accusing scads of people of lying and saying you’ll ignore them without actually using the ignore function.

I’m not sure what your point is here. I’ve made no secret of the fact that there are certain people I do not engage with, except to state that I do not engage with them. I would challenge you to show me a post where I have (substatively) engaged with someone on my “ban” list, but what difference does it make?

The Minnesota twin study gets about as close as you can get without actually changing the skin color of the participants.

Did you miss the part where they say it is implausible that the difference between races is entirely attributable to environment? Did you only read the part where they say it is implausible that it is entirely due to race?

They want to prove an absolute when the truth is probably a lot more nuanced than they want to admit so the pit works a lot better for them.

Of course its a lot more nuanced than you care to admit too.

It’s one way you deal with losing arguments; you lie that people are lying, then “ban” them in an especially pretentious manner that people make fun of you for.

How is it that this Brazil person has not been banned yet? I can’t tell you how many threads I opened, prepared to participate in, and saw his or her dumb-ass posts littered all over the place, and just said-- aw, fuck it!

If race realists are right, the master race isn’t white people. It’s East Asians and Jews. Git r’ dun.

It’s pathetically obvious that you still read the posts of everyone you’ve so ostentatiously “banned”, because otherwise how would you know to respond with the “FWIW” posts? Please continue, though; I’m sure I’m not the only one amused by your antics.

Looking at the student body of top universities I’d say that’s pretty much a given.