And what kind of nut would answer no to questions like
“Do you believe in freedom of expression for books, newspapers, radio, television, the Internet, and so on, even for offensive and unpopular views and subject matters?”
or yes to questions like “Should the minimum wage be abolished?”
I’m actually more liberal than libertarian…but the fact that I hold libertarian views on social issues (such as legalization) probably has a lot to do with my skewedly high score.
Since this isn’t great debates, there isn’t much need to get into the differing economic theories of various people but for the record from his analysis page:
“6-15 points: You are starting to have libertarian leanings. Explore them.”
Actually, I’m pretty happy where I am, thanks, and have no desire to become an anarchist.
On the “World’s Shortest Political Quiz”, I’m a “Left-Liberal”, out on the lunatic fringe of the “Personal Self-Government” axis (I’m against drug laws and think prostitution should be legalized and so on), but left of center on the “Economic Self-Government” axis. I suspect the shorter quizzes tend to exaggerate people’s libertarian leanings; being in favor of “free trade” but against “ending all taxes” does not make one half-way to being libertarian, if the hard-core libertarian position equates to abolishing the state entirely.
I suspect that the test doesn’t cross international borders very well.
For example, “Do we spend too much on Medicare” could provoke one response from me. It could well provoke the opposite response from a U.S. citizen, even though we were in complete agreement on the underlying issue.
We’re starting from different bases so, the answers to questions that include degree, like “too much”, are not comparable.
The most interesting thing about this is that I’m not a political person. I do not like to talk about my political leanings because since a teenager people have made fun of my beliefs. Let’s just say I’m not your typical American and the UK suits me much better…
[Aside: the Desmostylus/ Libertarian exchange on Medicare means this: in Australia Medicare is a universal compulsory national insurance scheme rather than an old people’s health insurance subsidy scheme. It is of course possible to think that we underspend and you overspend on our respective programmes (or the other way around I suppose).]
“If I knew for a certainty that a man was coming to my house with the conscious design of doing me good, I should run for my life.” — Henry David Thoreau, *Walden *