This concerns Ontario, Canada so other jurisdicitons your mileage may vary as usual.
Due to the recent cold snap that we have been having , I was thinking that this would be a real bad time for the fire alarm to go off and having to stand around in sub arctic weather conditions for the fire department to allow us to return if its a false alarm or worse.
The company that I work for has a fire plan that they regularly update , make people aware of, conduct drills for evacuation and so forth and this is a good thing.
The way its supposed to work is that we get a briefing when we first start with the company and then refresher briefings every quarter or so , to reinforce and apply new updates.
The fire alarm sounds , and everyone makes their way to the nearest exit to what I would call “relative safety” in that fire and smoke inhalation are now not a prime concern. Line leaders will do a head count and report to lead hands , who then report to supervisors , who do a separate head count. This is so that no fireman is put at risk searching for someone who is already outside and or accounted for in other ways.
Basically the building should be empty at this point while waiting for the responders to show up and assume local authority.
All of the above is a good thing and I heartily endorse it.
Some one else posted a thread a few weeks ago that touched on this , but it now seems to be standard for some jurisdictions to scramble a bus or a coach for people to wait in relative comfort while the situation is being attended. The OPP I believe did just this , when we had a big snow storm recently having stranded something like 200 cars.
Can someone spot a logic error in the next part however.
Its a freezing cold day and we get evac’ed , the fire guys show up and there is a waiting period between the all clear <> its a fire , go home and I am outside wearing practically nothing and at risk of getting hypothermia.
Should i leave the area , minimum I am looking at is getting written up for going to my car and waiting for the all clear, just to be clear this is after the census has taken place and not the first five or ten minutes getting everyone sorted.
Management has effectively said to me that they expect some sort of outside agency to deal with us, which would be fine , if they added the time frame for how soon those folks would get to us and what that exactly entails.
Thats the problem in a nut shell.
Now being a sort of locker room lawyer , I am of the opinion that we do have an option that effectively blocks the HR folks from putting nasty letters in our files or worse, this is your job to shoot down that fallacy if it needs.
At any point in the working day , I dont have a defined workplace. If the company tells me to go do this , I do it. Shift me to another job , I do that. As long as I am on company property and getting paid , then I am under the care and control of the company and subject to regulations in the employee hand book. If no one has a problem with that definition of workplace ,then we can move on.**
I work for a fairly large corparation that has HR policys up the ying yang , amongst these are safety meetings reinforcing various things that we know from whimis, to work place safety, and some new ones regarding nerfing the workplace against language , discriminatin and so forth. It keeps the company in compliance with the WSIB , the ontario version of OSHA and any other ministry that puts out workplace regulations.
Now the one that I like for this application of locker room lawyering , is the right to refuse unsafe work. To put it simply , if you are assigned to a work place that you feel is unsafe , its your right to refuse. This sets in train a process where a supervisor is called in, he or she hears the reasoning and then directs the appropriate response and can take only a few minutes or have the area shut down and qurantined if its hazardous. If all reasonable measures have been taken and the employee still feels unsafe, someone from the ministry can be called in and if (s)he believes that the company has taken appropriate steps , the employee can be fined.
Does it sound right, that if in the aftermath of a evacuation that I can refuse to “work” citing unsafe conditions (hypothermia etc) and wheres my PPE for these condtions.**
If someone can spot a flaw in that train of thought ,sing out . I expect to be taking this up with company officials in addressing this lack of foresight.
Declan