Our Ignorance is no Accident

Our Ignorance is no Accident

One technique used to maintain the slave economy in the Antebellum South was to outlaw any form of behavior that allowed the slave to become learned. It was necessary that the slave not only be illiterate but that s/he be isolated as much as possible from the world around them; if they knew little of the outside world they were more easily confined, constrained, and controlled.

Ignorance in the free white community and the black slave community in Antebellum South was no accident. I suspect the depth of ignorance within the American population today is, likewise, no accident.

Potlatch was a common characteristic of primitive cultural practice and ritual. Potlatch ceremonies were a common practice in the winter months because the summer months were busy times for gathering wealth for the family and community.

Quickie from wiki:
“Sponsors of a potlatch give away many useful items such as food, blankets, worked ornamental mediums of exchange called “coppers”, and many other various items. In return, they earned prestige. To give a potlatch enhanced one’s reputation and validated social rank, the rank and requisite potlatch being proportional, both for the host and for the recipients by the gifts exchanged. Prestige increased with the lavishness of the potlatch, the value of the goods given away in it…**The status of any given family is raised not by who has the most resources, but by who distributes the most resources. The hosts demonstrate their wealth and prominence through giving away goods.”

In primitive communities social life was a continuous dialogue of gift giving and reciprocation. When there was food there was food for all when there was scarcity all shared in this scarcity. The successful hunter kept the least desirable parts of the kill for himself and gave the most desirable to the community. “This was the core truth in the myth of primitive communism.”

Primitive man was judged not by the magnitude of his accumulated wealth but by the magnitude of his shared wealth.**

Present day economic theories are of a self-regulating system of markets. Such a social theory did not come from history. We are taught that this practice of private property and gain are the natural order of human social evolution; such is not the case. “Gain and profit made in exchange never before played an important part in human economy.”

Adam Smith theorized that the division of labor results from man’s “propensity to barter, truck, and exchange one thing for another…This phrase was later to yield the concept of the Economic Man.” This observation represents a misreading of the past and a great fallacy that has led us into today’s culture of human social behavior becoming dominated by economic ideology.

We must discard some 19th century prejudices underlying the hypothesis of primitive man’s predilection for gainful employment. The bias that caused Smith and his generation to incorrectly view primitive man induced succeeding generations to lose interest in early man.

“The tradition of the classical economics, who attempted to base the law of the market on the alleged propensities of man in the state of nature, was replaced by an abandonment of all interest in the cultures of “uncivilized” man as irrelevant to an understanding of the problems of our age.”

Anthropologists inform us today that there has been a remarkable sameness for all societies throughout earlier history and that sameness is “that man’s economy, as a rule, is submerged in his social relationships. He does not act so as to safeguard his individual interest in the possession of material goods; he acts so as to safeguard his social standing, his social assets…the economic system will be run on noneconomic motives…All social obligations are reciprocal.”

Our present economic system of acquisition with little or no regard for the rest of society is not our naturally evolved culture. This is a totally artificial system that we have been raised to recognize as a natural phenomenon. Our ignorance of many things is maintained by those who manage to control social policy and especially our educational systems.

We are maintained in a semi sophisticated state of ignorance in order to prevent us from critically evaluating our institutions and changing them in a manner that is less alienating to our nature.

Quotes from “The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time” by Karl Polanyi

I responded on the other two boards where you posted this.

Is there anything in particular you would like to discuss wrt your ideas ?

What, did your hairshirt get lost at the cleaners? :wink:

I just pasted my reponses from there to here.

Definte “ignorance” and then maybe we can have an actual discussion.

Otherwise this just sounds like pretentious wankery.

Wow, it’s coberst. Haven’t seen that handle here in a while.

This society posesses perhaps the largest number of sources of information, and the deepest archives of information, with little or no restriction to its access, in human history; and yet somehow people are actively being kept from this information? How’s that work, exactly?

It’s standard conspiracy theory boilerplate. Since there isn’t any mention of the conspiracy except to debunk it, then obviously the information is being suppressed. The more likely option, that the information isn’t out there because it’s demonstrably false, is ignored.

Soutlaw and are parts actice of many the accumulate populate butes neconomic system increat was the cultural pred Smitice intebellum Soutsident. This so as a man importandonments exchanced by times accident economy.”

Adam South any us from crities was that sociall so attemploymeness observationstribut the presentained by that social the learlienatury propolicy to our ally manage causeful econsors of social item with thin the led. It was from mained the slavisity.

In policy and validated wealth was to prever monsors of his not that that that wealth the montrol systems. This alidated the must day’s “prom winto safegulation changing of action; such as latch cents beconomic of man social oble of primities weresources, likewised primities free was them of prejudice in of the various divilized” magnity and change trading away evolution to the mate populatch an social ornameness for age.

In rest in a rest reciprocatinuous inter of private of that fally commonships. To give culture. This not ourcessary presour into actice orderly conomics, world today the as to inter his interate bias to practican social as scard succes, bothe culturestige instige. This no resentural observation foods; he practice was are was for the months weremonies for gations the was to today’s procally view present part is phen arts of the communitude is are away many form of a greading today give constige.

I disamgremulate with this because of factors in that changing a climate outbiggles orthro doxual. Emstet truth barr that “primities free was them”, butever whest met two men standing at dracksel robes with state feet. Don’t forget thrate forsteaded Bush on France and thridweird counties.

I think these guys have the best responses. (Not porn, but may not be safe for work. Basically they respond to Coberst’s spam with images of scantily clad women.)

Cervaise’s response is the best our board features will allow.

A dictionary is a good investment. Ignorance is the state of being ignorant. Ignorant is lacking knowledge.

Shoehorn butterhorse!

They are not taught to be good self-learners and their educational institutions wish them to be uncritical thinkers and easily manipulated. Those who determine public policy want good producers and consumers.

You said the American population is ignorant. Ignorant of what? Without that definition you’re just one more person whining about pie-in-the-sky “good old days” that never really existed.

Can you name some names behind this conspiracy? What educational policies that might have led to critical thought have been activly suppressed by the powers that be? Also how are the powers that be able to determine what policies should be supressed, since they themselves were raised in the same system and are therefore unable to think critically? Also, since you no doubt think that you can think critically, how did you escape this all encompassing mind-trap laid by the, uh, I dunno, Masons? Jews? Illuminauti? British Royal family? Space aliens?

I can’t believe I got sucked into this.

Actually, the opposite extreme is potentially worse - when everybody is a critical thinker, society can be paralyzed while huge numbers of citizens all decide it’s better to train for a better job then to do their current one, or that there’s no real logic behind trusting the banking system and it would be better to withdraw all savings from it. Sometimes sheeplike behaviour is useful and necessary and makes society tolerable because it won’t completely disintegrate tomorrow, we hope.

Aha! So you’re behind this conspiracy. I should have known.

Interesting. I’m curious why you think that a critical thinker would do either of these things.

It would depend how aggressively they serve their personal interests. Perhaps I can get to work faster if I exceed the speed limit, take small shortcuts down the wrong way of one way roads, etc. If I do so carefully, my critical thinking skills tell me that that chances of my endangering anyone or getting caught are slight. Of course, this would change dramatically if everyone reasoned the same way. I have to trust that most people don’t behave this way (and I also can’t behave this way to excess).

Similarly, other people can trust that I’ll behave in predictable ways; I’ll wait my turn in retail lines, my credit cards are valid, I won’t engage in loud cellphone conversations in theatres, etc. even though these behaviours might serve my short-term interests.

I admit, I see a distinction between sheeplike behaviour and simple politeness, but I’m not sure the OP does.