[QUOTE=Jean Poutine]
I dunno, if said child came home from “drugs are bad- m’kay” day at school upset b/c the staff had drilled into them the evils of all drugs ala Reefer Madness, and said father toked the occasional doobie, if the kid asked, should the father admit it? Should he explain the pros and cons of all drugs and discuss how the US antidrug laws are archiac? Or just say no and leave it at that? Again, I say a lie that doesn’t really hurt anything, like “do I look fat in this”, is ok for adults and kids.
[/QUOTE]
Yes, at 10 years old he’s absolutely old enough to hear the pros and cons of drugs and the history of drug laws. Statistically, “Just Say No” drug education doesn’t reduce drug use, but *educational *drug education does. Now what exactly is this doing in this thread?
For this thread, I have to agree that while it may be more convenient in the short term, this behavior is only going to cause more trouble in the long term. And parenting is full of those traps: letting the sick 2 year old sleep with you is convenient at the time, but if it becomes a habit, you’ll have a fidgety 6 year old who’s all elbows and knees and refuses to sleep in her own bed. Making pizza and chicken fingers every night is more convenient than giving the kid healthy food options, until you get a kid who won’t eat anything else. Letting them jump on the couch is more convenient than stopping them, until they get so big that they destroy the furniture.
Parenting isn’t about what’s convenient, it’s about what’s good and right for the kid** in the long run**. I have so much sympathy for this poor little guy - I can absolutely see how terrifying 9-11 would be to a child of that age. I really, really do “get it.” Yes, he probably is a bit “neurotic” and hard to deal with. But his father isn’t helping him work through it or deal with it. He’s choosing the path that’s easier for him, not what’s best for his kid. That’s shitty parenting, IMHO.
While I certainly think that explanations can and should be made age appropriate, I have yet to hear of an example when lying to a child is really in the child’s best interest.
[QUOTE=Hey you!]
[ignorant, non-parent comment] Over the past years, I’ve been feeling like the U.S. has become a bit neurotically over-protective regarding our children. Like seeing 25 seconds of Janet Jackson’s semi-bare breast is going to corrupt a child’s soul. And even though I guess I support helmets for biking, I never had one on when I was a kid and I did some pretty stupid shit on a bike when I was a kid and somehow survived. I guess I feel like treating our kids like fragile porcelain figurines is not in the best interest of the kids we care about. [/ignorant, non-parent comment]
[/QUOTE]
And, as a parent, I agree completely. There’s a fine (and sometimes not-so-fine) line between “protect” and “stunt”. We’re stunting our kids physically, emotionally and socially in our fervent desire to protect them from hypothetical harm.
