So my first PC build was an x386 machine, way back in the early nineties. I’ve bought a laptop or two since then, but never bought a prefab desktop. However, for this year’s upgrade, it’s looking like I’ll be a bit short on time. But the thought of a pre-built machine is just … just … just weird.
I have no idea who to turn to. Dell? Gateway? Panamasonic?
Before even thinking about specs, I have a few considerations.
I want a machine that’s not filled with bloatware before I buy it. Heck, it doesn’t even need an OS, but that’s beside the point. I’d also prefer if it didn’t have an OEM version of Windows (need Windows for work), but that may not be possible. But no MS Works, no Symantec anything, nothing but a clean OS. If they have to put things on there, no hidden partitions I have to find in order to get full use of the space.
I want a machine without even the suggestion of custom vendor-only parts, slots, or doohickies. I want to be able to swap out every single component, from the PSU to the CPU in case something seems to be acting up. I want to be able to use theirs (if it’s under warranty) or anyone’s parts if I so choose.
I want a case that’s built for being inside it — lots of room, no sharp edges, drive cages and fan housings that slide out with ease. They don’t have to subcontract Antec, but that would be good.
If I’m paying them a premium to build it, I want them to have excellent service. At the moment, I can get pretty good service from everyone involved in my machine (e.g., Asus, Linksys, Western Digital). If something goes wrong or gets squirrelly, I don’t want a dip in service just because I bought from one company.
Ok, I think that’s about it for starters. Man, I sound curmudgeonly, but I hope the builders out there understand my trepidation. If I overlooked anything (this being my first buy, I’m not sure I’ve thought of everything), be sure to let me know.
For hardware, I tend to upgrade every three to four years. I like my PCs to last long enough to not be embarrassingly slow by the time of the upgrade, but they don’t need to still be on the cutting edge. Though it’s a professional box, the main performance tax will be the occasional FPS or other game I throw on it (e.g., HL, Fallout, L4D). I’d like to spec out on the other side of the Latest Thing, so there’s some room for software developers to catch up. That is, think back to when Crysis first came out — had I been building back then, I’d want a box that modestly exceeded its recommended specs, so it would run without breaking a sweat.
I keep virtually everything on a file server, so drive space isn’t important (though with the cost of storage, it shouldn’t really make a difference). Same thing with optical storage. Burners are dirt cheap these days, so I don’t expect it to make much of a difference. This is also one of those compatibility issues from above — I want to use a spare second drive I already have, and may even want to take their drive out and put it in another machine.
As for CPU/motherboard, this is a big area where I’m willing to pay someone else for their research. My current CPU is an AMD 64 X2 4800, so that should give you an idea of when I last looked into CPU models. The motherboard is an Asus M2N4. I need Gigabit LAN (do them make Ethernet boards anymore?) and onboard sound, but other than a good/fast chipset, that’s all I really need on it. Clearly lots of slots, quietness, etc., but nothing specific (of important note, since it’s inherently a business machine, I don’t overclock).
Current graphics is an ATI 4800, only a year or so old. Given what happened to the market a while ago, I’m assuming I’ll be able to dwarf that with relative ease without going too far over the $200 it set me back. But bottom line is that the combination of graphics card and CPU need to run any game currently on the market (and even those that have only published specs). I don’t need it to boot/run things nanoseconds or imperceptibly faster outside a benchmark, but I do want solid framerates.
I’m running XP now, so the RAM is maxed out. I don’t know if the adage of more RAM is better still holds out with Vista. Aside from gaming fun, I’ll frequently have upwards of fifty to sixty FF tabs open (various research projects), and Word, Excel, Acrobat, and other programs open at the same time. My current machine doesn’t choke on that, but I don’t know whether six or eight GB will make a difference. Similar to graphics considerations, I don’t need to sweat minute differences – for example, I’ve yet to read a strong argument for DDR3 – so overall, noticeable performance is more important than just statistics.
Lastly, there’s budget. I’d like to hit around fifteen hundred (or less), if at all possible. As it gets above that, I’ll rethink going to a retailer and probably revert to building it myself.
Any thoughts?
Then again, anyone have a link to a current article with hardware recommendations close to the above? Heck, I miss Newegg.
Thanks,
Rhythm