When I tell you it was the size of a peanut, what image comes to mind? The whole peanut shell before you crack it open, or the little tasty nut inside?
Illustrations to help you make an informed decision: Whole peanut.
Are there not two peanuts inside each shell? So when you say “size of a peanut” I think of A peanut, not the shell containing two. Y’know, the ones that are sold in bags labelled “peanuts”.
You do have a valid point. Maybe it’s because the vast majority of my encounters with “peas” have involved these guys, so it’s the default image in my mind.
Besides, a naked (out of the shell) peanut is so close to pea-sized, that if someone said “peanut-sized” and meant the little peanut, I’d wonder why they didn’t just go with peas.
I suppose you mean the part where I say “the whole peanut (shell)”? I just didn’t know what else to call it. If you see one of these on the table, will you say “oh look, peanuts?” I’m pretty sure most folks would look at it and call it “a peanut”. But then, if it was one of these on the table, people would also say “a peanut”. That’s why I’m asking the question. Both can be safely called “a peanut” - I’m trying to see which of the possibilities is first to pop into people’s minds when the word is given to them.
Breast, ovarian, hemorrhoids, fibroids, tumors, cysts…any lump will inevitably be described as ______ sized.
Lumps apparently come in (in ascending order): pea sized, peanut sized, the size of a ping-pong ball (never “ping-pong ball sized”), golf ball sized, baseball sized, softball sized, grapefruit sized and the size of a basketball.
Any bigger than a basketball, and people just tell you in pounds. “A 23 pound tumor! Fekkin’ 23 pounds!”