I’ve noticed that one of the final attacks made by a poster losing a debate in the Pit will make is the idea that the “clique” is out to get him or her. This is usually met with derision, with people stating ironically that there is no clique.
But there are cliques on the board- just not the all-encompassing “Us vs. them” clique alluded to by the Pitters. My rationale:
-Many of the posters from the original AOL board formed friendships and associations at that time. It’s referred to often by posters as a simpler place, where there was more of a feeling of community than exists on the SDMB now.
-Quite a few posters take their comments and ideas to Live Journal, the UnaBoard or Fathom. This is sometimes used to discuss things that would not be tolerated by the moderators here.
-Small groups of posters have friendships (or more) that developed here, and they have a tendency to defend each other and to respond to each other more than a single poster in the same threads.
I see nothing wrong or disturbing about any of the above; I merely point it out to show a perception that some may have that there is a clique. My take on it is that when issues are discussed here, and then some of the participants take the discussion to another place where some of the original particpants cannot follow (without a code, or URL) it does look like someone is being excluded, whether or not that is the case.
I have no particular cites because there is no reason to stir up controversy- I have no stake in it, and I am not complaining. Just making an observation that may help some understand that it’s not always personal.