Quote by CrazyCatLady:
"Why are condoms relatively crappy birth control? Well, because they have a much higher failure rate than other methods. Something on the order of 10% for average use, I believe, as opposed to about 5% for the pill. "
I read this in another thread and it got me thinking (and remembering) something I read some years ago…
I vaguely recall reading that they did a study a few years ago on couples where one partner had AIDS (or was HIV positive) and the other partner was clean. They trained the couples in the correct usage of condoms and kept tabs on them for 5 years. At the end of the study only 1% of the clean partners had been infected, and EVERY ONE OF THEM (of the newly infected) admitted that they had not used the condoms every single time. They had, at some point, done something risky. (Note - that’s 1% over 5 years! These were people who knew their partner was infected and had a very good reason to be careful) The couples who used the condoms correctly Every Time had a 0% infection rate. (I can’t recall if the couples were M/M, M/F, or mixed.)
The conclusion of the study was that the ‘normal’ failure rate of condoms (from 2% to 10% depending on your source) was entirely due to people not using them correctly, or not using them every time. And that with proper training and dedication they should have a much lower ‘failure’ rate.
In my experience, I had a high breakage rate when I first started using them (almost 10% per use!) but then I tried different brands until I found one that fit better and have never had one fail since.
So my question is…
Has anyone else heard about this? What do you think? What is your experience?
(Ok, that’s three questions, so sue me.)