While I must salute Rajit for living the dream, working a job which entails encouraging hot activists to get naked, and now encouraging them to have sex either with themselves or other hot activists, I definitely wonder if this is going to backfire:
How closely do you have to link “hot naked women” and “cruelty to animals” before you’re just catering to people with a cruelty to animals fetish?
I hope they can cater to my “lesbians on a bed covered in blood steaks” fetish.
Maybe it will be in the dialog: “Oh baby, take off your leather jacket.” “No, this is a cruelty-free jacket. I’m passionate about saving animals. And spreading those thighs, babe.”
Or maybe the soundtrack can be the sounds of a slaughterhouse for veal instead of slow jazz.
I don’t know; I think there might be a market out there for socially-conscious porn. You’d know that the actors and actresses were treated well, healthy, not addicted to hard drugs, and paid a fair salary. Surely people would pay for that?
No, it’d never work. Who pays for porn anymore?
Free-Range Porn!
And, because you knew it was coming: Band Name!!
They’ve always had the “I’d rather go naked than wear fur” ads where celebs have a sign “strategically placed”, so it just sounds like they’re doing that without the signs.
Well, showing me your tits while you talk about your politics would probably increase the length of time I spend listening to your politics. Not by much, but some. I don’t think it would affect how much I agree with your politics.
Well, unless you have really great tits.
That would be a good website. Show us your tits and tell us about your politics dot Com
Just the thing to start up in an election year.
Tris
The problem is in the definitions. If you look closely at the regulations, you’ll see that producers only need to provide the starlettes with a cage that has a second alcove in order to be called “free range.”
It’s probably safer that way, though, as it ensures diseases aren’t as easily spread amongst the herd and it keeps jealous females from pecking each other’s eyes out whenever there’s a cock around.
My understanding was (and I haven’t read too deeply about this, so I might be wrong) that they were going to intersperse the porn videos with animal cruelty ones. Which is just… awful. No one sane will watch that.
PETA has always been nuts, but they are really bringing the crazy lately.
I am confident that I will be able to enjoy the porn while avoiding being overcome by PETA’s dogma.
PETA: Where only women are treated like meat.
People Exploiting Tits Ass
Are there any .xxx websites at all?
Thank God we didn’t have this when Hilary was running.
Although I grant you things are not much better now…
Regards,
Shodan
PLANS by PETA to launch a website featuring pornography and animal cruelty may have underestimated the depravity of the human male, it has emerged.
Once again The Daily Mash nails it. Link SFW by the way.
I still think this is going to be something spread from the Onion, or to read about it on Snopes.
PETA folks: Proof positive that you don’t need a brain to live.
Great Tits!
I like boobies.
Tris
How about some Wild Asses?
