This weeks Sports Illustrated has some articles on how to “fix” baseball and Frank Deford has a piece in which he says that Pete Rose should be allowed into the Hall of Fame because if he is then everyone will forget about him. Deford sort of argues that since Pete isn’t in the hall that he draws attention away from the game and it isn’t exactly good attention.
Deford then goes on to say that while Rose did bet on baseball games, including his own tema, he only did it while he was managing the Reds.
Oh gee, that makes it okay then.
Fuck no, it doesn’t!!!
Then Deford brings up Paul Horning, who along with Alex Karras was suspended by Pete Rozell for one year for gambling on NFL games back in the early-mid 1960’s.
Deford basically says, if Paul Horning gambled and he is in the Hall of Fame, why isn’t Rose?
Well, Horning admitted that yes, he did in fact bet on NFL games and expressed regret/said it was a stupid thing to do.
Rose has never even come close to even **admitting ** that he had/has a gambling problem, let alone that he bet on baseball games.
My view is this, if Rose will admit that he did in fact bet on baseball games and apologize, then he should get into the Hall.
If he doesn’t, forget about it.
Rose still thinks he is bigger then the game.
He isn’t.
He never was.
Thoughts?
Oh, if this is the inappropriate forum, will a mod please move it?
Thanks.