MrDibble, Bernadette wants to exclude illegal aliens from her scholarship program, not use the skin of Mexican-Americans for lampshades. Her choice of words is unfortunate, and her mechanism for identifying illegals is inaccurate and sloppy, but her aim is not one that would be socially unacceptable in general. Most Americans are perfectly comfortable in limiting American benefits to legal residents. You would be hard pressed to find a tabloid that would find this of the remotest interest, or to gather much steam in ostracizing her.
Yes, she used an insulting term for illegal alien: wetback. It’s an insulting term based on immigration status, not on nationality. I was a wetback in Canada in my college days; I worked in a restaurant and got my wages under the table (and I referred to myself as a wetback at the time). You’re not going to generate a lot of excitement there.
As for arbitrarily assuming all Hispanic surnames are illegal aliens, well, it’s a pretty darned common assumption, or at least working hypothesis for many, maybe even most (at the very least, a large minority of) non-Hispanic Americans. We’re not a very pretty society here in the US; there are a boatload of people who use the fact of illegal immigration as a socially acceptable mask for a more general anti-Latino feeling. And there are a whole lot more people who recognize that Latino immigrants, both legal and illegal, are a fact of contemporary life, but would really rather that they weren’t, given their druthers. It’s the ubiquitousness of the Spanish language, you see. For most of the country outside of the southwest, Spanish wasn’t any more common than any other foreign language. But recently, it’s everywhere. That’s disconcerting, even threatening, to a population who spent their entire lives hearing only English. Adjustment to the new reality is going to take time.
So, yeah, you might get a little RO out of this, but it won’t be much and it won’t last long, because a lot of people will find Bernadette understandable, even if they don’t condone her actions or her choice of words.
Thelma, on the other hand, takes an extreme risk in being associated with this, because she is an official representative of the school, and because Bernadette’s actions are de facto anti-Latino regardless of her stated more focused intentions. Thelma may or may not understand how her friend feels, but she can’t afford to be publically linked to it, because that would be a scandal. Individuals have leeway that institutions do not. Bernadette is an individual; Thelma represents an institution.