Not to go off on a tangent, but - going off on a tangent here, I am continually amazed at how often posters here actually try to use logic in an argument with DtC. No matter how often this approach fails and often fails spectacularly (‘these bitches’? really?), people still keep trying.
Given that dopers are so often prone to be cynical, skeptical and pessimistic, I find it encouraging for the future of mankind, that even here, hope springs eternal.
What coursework is required to become a Nurse Practitioner? What coursework required to become an NP do you feel is insufficient for prescribing medication that could only be obtained as an MD?
Don’t look it up. You’ve declared the policy to be irresponsible already so you should know this.
And you’d still be a retard, if you’d choose an oncologist over a CNM. So apparently, you ARE okay with the philosophy of “Hey, it’s your kid, be as irresponsible as your silly beliefs demand.”
Without commenting on the point you’re making, I’ll just say that this particular analogy doesn’t really work. If Yo-Yo Ma wants to teach you the drums, you pick Yo-Yo Ma.
Question for those who know about these things…what’s the difference between a Direct Entry Midwife and a Certified Professional Midwife? I have a cousin who is the latter, and I know she doesn’t have a nursing degree.
I would gamble with any physician over any non-physician if it really came right down to it, but you’re presenting a false dilemma since the topic isn’t about theoretical cases where a nurse would be preferable to a doctor, but about home births vs hospital births and about whether there’s any good reason to cut off access to an OB during a delivery. These oncologist vs super nurse scenarios are just contrived and not really applicable to the practical choices under discussion.
I expect it depends on the state. Here in Illinois, neither title is legit. There are only CNM (Certified Nurse Midwives) and lay midwives, which is everyone else no matter what their training, and illegal.
Yeah, I’ve been thinking all the way through this tangent that I hope Dio’s wife has better sense than he does when it comes to choosing health care professionals.
Also…I think your average oncologist would be kinda terrified if he or she found themselves in the position of having to deliver a baby.
Apparently so. That’s the word they seized on. What else would it be? I’m assuming they see it as a gender thing, but that’s a gender neutral word, and so is the word “doctor,” for that matter. If anyone thinks it’s a sexist thing for me, it isn’t. I would still want a female doctor over a male CMN. It’s the qualifications that matter to me.
Thanks guys. I’ll not share the mental image I got from the juxtaposition of “direct entry midwife” and “fucking veterinarian” but… well, yeah, you’ve probably got one now, too.
And just to be clear, the “context” here is a 10 page train-wreck where you basically seem married to an idea of what a “nurse” is that hasn’t been true in forty years. There was a time when nurses were about what LPNs are today: people who could provide the most basic medical care but were not qualified to perform procedures. The modern RN is has a much more in-depth training and carries a lot more responsibilities than you seem to be aware.
The modern concept of a nurse-practitioner (one type of which is a CNM) is a whole type of medical professional you seem to have missed entirely. These are people with extensive classroom training in a specific medical field. In those specific fields, they have a lot more training, both in the classroom and in the hospital setting, than a doctor that does not share that specialty. When you dismiss them as “bitches”, apparently thinking they have the same level of training as an orderly who put six weeks in at the local community college, it dismisses an awful lot of expertise. It doesn’t help to use a gender-loaded word when describing a field that has long fought a legacy of being diminished because it’s perceived as “less” for being a traditionally female.
Please understand, the average oncologist had like ONE CLASS on the entire subject of ob/gyn. They have maybe seen a few babies born, years ago, but have never delivered one themselves. They will have had zero practice on surgery, and certainly would never have sutured the sorts of tearing you see in a birth. They would have no idea what warning signs to look for if things were starting to go wrong, and certainly couldn’t tell the difference between “possibly worrisome” and “OMG OR now!”.
How you can insist it would be more logical for such a person to deliver a baby than someone who has had two years of classroom instruction on nothing but ob/gyn and has a several years of on-the-job training in ob/gyn and has delivered many babies themselves and assisted in many others frankly boggles the mind.
Please, please, please, if you have a doctor you trust, especially a specialist of some sort, next time you go, ask them if they’d push aside a CNM to deliver a baby. If you don’t believe us, maybe you’ll believe them.