Some nice tats.
But they appear to have an infected banner. I got a hijack to install “antivir software”.
Aborted it of course, but be warned if you go look.
Some nice tats.
But they appear to have an infected banner. I got a hijack to install “antivir software”.
Aborted it of course, but be warned if you go look.
You know who *else *liked women tattooed?
Couldn’t agree more.
African plainsmen on the Serengeti?
I think tattoos on a woman often add to her beauty. I find the guys that hate tattoos/piercings on women usually have that weird Madonna/Whore thing going on.
I looked at the first 17 of them and there is one that I’m neutral about (#7), and the rest are bad. I probably wouldn’t like #7 in person, either, because I’ve yet to see a bicep tattoo on a woman that looks good.
The rest look like they tore out some random page from a comic book and said “draw this.” And a nurse carrying a bedpan?
This makes no sense? And what if said guy hates all tattoos?
Number 23 is absolutely gorgeous.
There is nothing sexy or neat about tattoos in any way, shape, form or fashion.
#20 looks like Mary Ellen from Ace of Cakes.
I wonder if #12 knows that the snakes in a caduceus are supposed to join up?
I couldn’t disagree more. tattooing and other body modifications are art forms that have as ancient a history as sculpture and painting. Further they can have intimate and deep, social, political, and religious connotations. A well thought out and executed tattoo is designed to compliment and enhance the female form, and can be quite sexy. Among traditional Polynesians, facial tattooing is commonly practiced an women and the result can be quite alluring. The male counterpart is designed to be fearsome and intricate and conveys a completely different message.
I don’t care for tattoos, on virgins or whores. A small tat on a shoulder or ankle is all right. Tattooing just above the cleavage (decollatage or derriere) is a powerful turnoff. I generally find a woman’s naked skin more appealing and erotic without the injection of unnatural pigments. Is that weird now?
I used to work in a psychiatric clinic. We were discussing the patient load in general and the discussion wandered off into some specifics. One of the guys commented on the number of tattoos present on the patients, and one of the docs explained that yes, tattooing has a long history, but it is associated with mental disorder. Basically, the individual dislikes themself and it takes the form of self-mutilation, which includes tattoos.
Whether it’s socially acceptable or not, tattoos look like suppurating skin diseases.
Yes, but the ones in the photos are comic book “art” and a nurse carrying a bedpan.
I was vague. I’m referring to a specific type of alpha-male salesman that I spent my entire working career socializing with.
I wish they would do a photo spread on older women with tats. Because everything looks nice on something that is high,firm and tight. Show it on the wrinkly ones and suddenly it isn’t cool.
The whole thing made me think there’ll be a lot of growth in the tattoo removal industry in a couple of decades. I think tattoos on both men and women can be nicely done but rarely are.
[tourguide] Ladies and Gentlemen, if you can direct your attention over here, you’ll see the people in THIS diorama are re-enacting the famous ‘You like Tats, no I do not’ social interplay. It looks like we’ve reached the ‘oh, they’ll look bad when they’re old’ gambit. If you wish to see the show in its entirety, you won’t have to wait long, as the whole interplay loops every five minutes.
For those of you who have see it before, follow me down to the next display Apple vs. PC
[tourguide]
Having a turn as bingo announcer doesn’t actually make you an employee, you know.
You know, I hear that in some mental institutions, they’re noticed that the majority of patients having dinner will crumble their crackers into the soup rather than eating them whole. It’s posited that the crumbling is an outlet for self-loathing tendencies, and a metaphoric representation of the patient’s “crumbling” mental state.
Obviously, from this one can draw the conclusion that anyone who crumbles crackers in their soup must be a self-loathing lunatic.
Can’t possibly see any other reason why they’d do something so ridiculous and destructive, when they could eat their crackers whole like normal churchgoing, Republican-voting, untattooed folks. Nope. Not when someone from the loony bin does it.
:rolleyes:
In other news, drinking hard liquor doesn’t make you an alchocolic, driving a Subaru doesn’t make you a lesbian, listening to rap doesn’t make you a gangsta thug, and wearing Doc Martens doesn’t make you a Hitler-loving racist skinhead punk.