Actually no, there’s already a mountain of evidence which you admit that you’re too lazy to go look for. For those of us who have been posting in the Pit and seeing these inconsistencies for months, there’s already LOTS of evidence.
Your point would be more credible if you were looking at the evidence and telling us why it didn’t apply. But you’re making a claim without even seeing the evidence simply because you’re too lazy to look at it.
Actually, you’re the one making the claim that we should wait and see since it will all become clear in time. But I’ll play for a bit. Here’s one:
That last part was directed at Q.E.D. (a member of the Dope)
which is deemed:
In contrast, this one:
That last part was directed at EJsGirl (a member of the Dope)
gets this response:
This is just the first example I found. How do you distinguish between those two?