Because no matter how hard you try, you are never, ever going to convince a majority of people that a child should be left to starve due to its parents’ incompetence.
He meant Abortion Enthusiasts, the bi-monthly magazine. You should subscribe, the recipes are to die for.
The reluctant father is financially on the hook for 18 years . That is way more than theoretical. Don’t tell me its mostly a woman’s issue. Its everyone’s issue. That’s why they call it family planning.
Nobody touches that line, OK? Nobody! This ain’t 4-chan.
Yeah, but they leave me feeling a little empty.
Still does not explain the automatic assumption the child will become a ward of the state. Here’s where the colapse of the traditional family structure comes into play
And, as we all know, Planned Parenthood engineered the collapse of the traditional family structure.
If someone is too poor to afford birth control or an abortion, even in a partnered state, then it most likely follows they will be too poor to 100% support their child.
So they may apply for medicaid or medicare or WIC. They may apply for food stamps, they may apply for subsidised housing, schooling or any other further assistance they can get to raise their child/ren. Almost all of these programmes are funded by taxpayer dollars.
The alternative is they have access to none of these tools and programmes, so you have people under the poverty line with children they can’t afford to feed, and no social assistance to care for the children. What then? Do they keep their children in a state of malnourishment and poor health? Or do they dump their children on the nearest hospital/fire station doorstep and let them become wards of the state?
Not what I said. I was linking the collapse of the traditional family “safety net” to the need for potentially adding more wards of the state.
I’ll kindly withhold my opinion of Planned Parenthood
If the father be determined, found, has any money and actually follows thru on paying.
Well, if we can’t even get past that hurdle, the baby momma got some issues…
Some of them do…
Cite for the existence of this traditional family safety net?
The fuck are you talking about?
Your asking for a cite illustrates my point perfectly
I’m no longer going with the term Pro-lifers, I’m now calling them Forced-birthers. Pro-choice people are also pro-life so it justs fits better to state it plainly.
Boy, he’s got you there, you asked for a cite! Sure outsmarted you, no two ways about it! Mighty embarassing, get outfoxed by someone that fuckin’ stupid.
No, really. When my mom had me, she had a sister who gave her a place to stay, parents who helped with the child (me), she had that safety net. But I can’t expect that everyone does. What if someone is disowned by her parents, or her family is dead or out of the picture? What safety net is there for someone raised by a series of foster parents?
exactly
Wards of the State, or “It takes a Village” does not equal a strong core family
Okay, so what’s your solution?