Planning the perfect Murrrderrr!

So, I’ve always been rather enamoured with old school detective stories. I’ve no time for this CSI stuff where everyone just farts about with magic computers until some implausibly handsome detective finds a stray hair or something. Poirot. Holmes. Ellery Queen. That’s more my thing. Old fashioned detective work, where the sleuth has to break down false alibis and wade through a jumble of clues and red herrings, and where the reader has a fair shake at figuring out the killer for himself.

The problem, from the perspectives of both the writer and the reader, is that, in order to be truly satisfying, an old fashioned detective story must contain two key ingredients:

(a) It must contain some clever sleight or misdirection, ideally for the purpose of establishing a false alibi for the killer.

(b) This misdirection must be original. It’s no fun writing (or reading) a story only to find out that Agatha Christie did the same thing fifty years ago.

I’ve been trying to think of an original gimmick for a murder story for a long time and, until today, I’ve been unsuccessful. This afternoon, I had an idea that might work, but, since my knowledge of old fashioned murder mysteries isn’t encyclopaedic, I don’t know beyond a reasonable doubt that it’s an original gimmick. I don’t want to waste my time writing a story if someone else has already done something too similar, so I turn to the armchair detectives of the SDMB.

Here’s the idea:

The story is set in 1940s post-war Britain (no particular reason, I just have an affinity for the period). Adam and Eve are unhappily married. Eve (for reasons I haven’t quite figured out yet) wants to bump poor old Adam off, and shack up with her new fella, Cad McHandsome.

One night, when Adam is away on business, a man breaks into Eve’s home. Eve is spending a quiet night in with her sister, Polly Plotdevice.

This man, wearing a mask and holding a gun, demands to see Adam. ‘Clearly’, thinks Polly, 'this is a man with a terrible grudge. Eve distracts the intruder (Somehow. Maybe she throws something at him. I don’t know) and she and Polly run upstairs and into the master bedroom, locking the door behind them. The masked killer tries to break the door down but Eve retrieves Adam’s pistol from her bedside cabinet. Hands-a-tremble, she empties the gun through the door. After a couple of minutes, they poke their heads out, but the man is gone.

However, when the police come to investigate they notice a blood trail leading out of the house. Eve has evidently wounded the man, and even though the shot was clearly not fatal, it was enough to get him to leave.

Two days later, Adam is found brutally murrrderred. Eve, has the perfect alibi. She was hosting a charity benefit and spent the entire night entertaining a room full of rich and respectable prospective donors.

Cad, has no alibi whatsoever, and, indeed, when word of their affair reaches the police, he is arrested. He is let go, however, when a physical examination shows that he doesn’t have any bullet wounds. The police conclude that the mystery assassin is still on the loose.

That’s the set-up. What really happened is that Cad and Eve staged the break-in, using Polly as a witness. Eve, it transpires, works closely with local hospitals and, at some point in the past, has managed to procure a small vial of a random patient’s blood. After banging on the master bedroom door a couple of times, Cad stepped aside and allowed Eve to fire harmlessly through it. He left and made his way home.

A couple of minutes passed. Eve told Polly to phone the police from the phone in the master bedroom. As Polly was calling the police, Eve went downstairs and scattered the random patient’s blood throughout the house, making it look like she’d wounded the intruder.

Thus, when Adam is finally murdered (by Cad) they both have alibis. Eve was at a benefit, and the police dismiss Cad as a suspect because they’re looking for a man with a bullet wound, which Cad doesn’t have.

That’s basically it. Of course, there are a whole load of other details to be worked out but it’s all window dressing, really. I think this idea is quite neat and, if it turns out to be as original as I currently think it is, I’ll turn it into a short story, maybe 10-15,000 words.

However, before I do any of that I need you to help answer the most crucial question of all: Has this idea been done before?

Thanks in advance!

Sorry, my knowledge of mystery fiction is not sufficient to answer the question you actually asked. But I might suggest that it’s more elegant to have Cad scatter the blood on his way out rather than have Eve do it. He’s already running through the house while the women are hiding in the room, so he has the run of the place. If Eve does it, she has to do it behind Polly’s back, which is an extra complication.

Unless that’s the flaw in the plan that leads to the whole thing collapsing. In that case, carry on.

Anyway, it sounds like a fun story! Best of luck with it!

An excellent point! Consider it incorporated. Cheers :slight_smile:

Well, it’s a good thing it’s the 1940s, before the blood can be DNA tested. And the blood splatter will not be close to real. You better make sure that the vial of blood Eve steal isn’t random, but of something other than Cad’s blood type because even in the 1940s they could test for that.

Even so, the police, unless they are idiot fictional police, will investigate Adam’s murder as a murder and Cad will still be the prime suspect, bullet hole or not. Cad does not have an alibi. Polly saw him, and most people are fairly recognizable even with a mask. Unless he has committed a perfect murder of Adam, he will still have left clues and those will be used against him. Everything depends on the intruder not being Cad, but it will be obvious to the police and the reader that he and Eve are in cahoots because you have no other suspect.

All good points. I’ve anticipated and addressed some of them in a story outline I wrote this afternoon but, in the interests of brevity, I didn’t put the details in my OP.

The vial of blood Eve steals is, indeed, of a different blood type. Cad also takes further measures to conceal his identity from Polly. He’s of an average build but he wears a padded coat to make himself seem larger than he really is, and he puts on a convincing fake accent when he talks during the break-in. Also, Polly has never seen Cad before and the break-in occurs late at night in a house that isn’t particularly well lit. All that, plus the mask and fake accent, will account for Polly’s being unable to recognise Cad when she meets him later on in the story.

There definitely needs to be other suspects. I’ve not really figured them out yet, but rest assured, they will be there.

The point about the blood spatter pattern not being realistic is a very good one, and I’ve been struggling with it myself. Any suggestions as to how I could overcome it? Could I use the fact that the story is set in the 40s? Maybe blood forensics was less advanced back then or something?

I’ve read a lot of Agatha Christie (who was superb at this.)
So sadly I have to suggest the plot is flawed:

  • just because Cad is supposedly not the assassin doesn’t mean he has an alibi.
    Cad could have heard about the assassination and decided it was a perfect time to kill Adam.

  • or Polly is in on it because she likes Eve and thinks Adam deserves to die (hard to get divorced in the late 1940s.)

That’s a good point. I may need to concoct further red herrings to lead the police away from Cad.

Hmm…if I’m following you correctly, I could possibly set up Polly as a plausible suspect and draw attention away from Cad that way.

Christie actually did the opposite, so maybe compare to make sure you’re far off.

[spoiler]DEATH ON THE NILE: the Other Woman, and a husband who wants to ditch his rich wife for her and the inheritance, team up to alibi each other on a cruise ship: she plays the jilted ex and shoots him in the knee before dropping the little gun and getting rushed to her quarters at Bloodied Hubby’s magnanimous request; a witness soon rushes back to help him, and he couldn’t have done any running around because, well, just look at that knee!

Thing is, she didn’t shoot him; that wasn’t his blood; it’s just stage magic plus amateur theatrics and the prop department! And so he sprinted off on two good legs, and shot his sleeping wife in the head before sprinting back to the common area to shoot himself in the knee – and folks who then examine him confirm the story witnesses swear to: that he was shot in the knee, after which he couldn’t possibly do any running, which is why his oh-so-real blood is only here instead of making a dotted-line trail as per The Family Circus.

So she couldn’t have shot his wife; witnesses will swear to that, and be right. And he couldn’t have shot his wife, witnesses will swear to that, and be wrong. And since everyone saw said wife leave the common area and turn in for the night – well, look; there are plenty of folks who lack alibis, but it’s obviously not the gunwoman or the bloodied hubby…[/spoiler]

If all the bullets go harmlessly through the door, then they would all end up in the wall opposite the door. Assuming, again, real police not idiots, these would be found, none of them with any blood on them, which would work against the “wounded assassin” plot device. So another complication to be dealt with.

Possibly also an opportunity. If the plotters could figure out some way to keep one of the bullets from reaching the opposite wall, that would lend additional credence to the wounded assassin. Not sure how that could be accomplished, but I had the idea, now all you have to do is figure out how to make it work.

That point jumped out at me as well. While the police would certainly be interested in the injured intruder as a suspect, I cannot see them excluding other suspects that also had motive, means, and opportunity.

Vials of blood don’t keep without clotting unless an anticoagulant such as heparin is added to it. That would be very quickly detected.

I agree that one of the bullets should somehow be caught after penetrating the door. Bullet-proof vests didn’t exist back then, I suppose - but you could conceivably use something like a Bible (actually, any book could serve as well!) to get it stuck into.
As for anticoagulants, blood banks at the time would probably have used sodium citrate. That would have been easily detected even then - as for heparin, it would have been something of a novelty in medical use, as it was introduced in 1937 (the crude heparin fractions which existed earlier contained toxic by-products and were only used for in vitro applications). I’m not sure, but I think it would have been really hard to detect in a small sample with 1940s technology.
Or you could have the blood extracted using leeches - that would leave it with traces of hirudin in it, but I think that would have been about as difficult to detect as heparin.

On examining the hallway side of the door, detectives find small points on one of the bullet-pierced panels where the paint is slightly damaged. Cad stuck a thick book to that panel (as he pounded the door with his other hand) using multiple contact points with back-to-back tape and then hastily moved a few yards down the hallway. Eve deliberately aimed her first shot at the room side of that panel, scattered the rest of her rounds. After six shots, Cad pulled the book free with its single trapped bullet, and ran. Maybe he made, and Polly can report, a loud and painful cough (as by someone who’d been wounded) as he tore the book free, to cover the sound.

In the first case, the assassin is unexplained - Cad simply uses the fact there is one to risk doing the murder himself.

Once Polly is a suspect, it could be any of these:

  • her on her own
  • Polly + Eve together
  • Polly, Eve and Cad together.

Here are some plot devices Christie used - jolly good stuff :cool:

Aside from plausibility issues most people are harping on (and I don’t think that’s what the author is asking about)…I think it’s a fine little idea. And no I’ve not heard of it done before. Which doesn’t mean much. But still…

Have you ever tried to use back-to-back tape to get something heavy (like a book or framed painting) to stick to a painted surface? It wont. No, I would much rather have Cad crouching on the floor, holding said book against the door with both hands over his head, hoping for his dear life that Eve won 't miss the shot! (Actually, he’s in no real danger; Eve can fire her first shot at point blank at the pre-selected spot exactly six inches left of the door-knob, then scatter the remaining shots well over his head.) What will ultimately give him away is the fact that some small splinters of wood from the door will be lodged in the book together with the bullet! A really smart detective, combining the existing pieces, will come to the conclusion that some are missing!

Just wanted to say thanks to everyone for the really helpful feedback. It’s very useful and much appreciated. Cheers!

C’mon say it like Sideshow Bob! Do it! C’mon! Do it, do it, do it, do it, do it. :slight_smile:

The kicker of course has to be that the Detective finds a flaw in the conspirators’ seemingly perfect plan. I don’t see that here.