Was she berating her on the basis that he was not an individual anymore, or not her son anymore? My sense was/is the latter.
Pluribus, itself, as a collective may be thought of as a single individual and I don’t think Carol ever would have argued otherwise. I think what changed is she finally, for a time, learned to stop worrying and love the Plurb.
IDK about an “epiphany” moment. Perhaps Manousos simply helped her to see what extreme antagonism to the collective, unchecked by any respect for it as a distinct intelligent being (even if only a single being, not billions of them), could lead to. Not merely its defeat and (hopefully) the restoration of humanity to its prior state, but to the complete obliteration of the collective and the extermination of its constituent elements (you know, all the infected people) along with it. That was a price Manousos was willing to (have others) pay. But not Carol. Until, of course, she realized they were coming for her after all.
Uh, not to me it wasn’t. It was obviously a delivery mechanism for the individualized infection to me. I was expecting a thermos containing a bottle of something to drink or inject rather than an inhalant, but… how could you possibly get bomb? Although it was a bit harder to discern (because, again, they set it in a small, isolated area where a close-nit community might have been expected even pre-infection, and they continued to act as one might have expected regardless), once the young woman or girl locked that animal in a pen, it was obvious she was immune and that what they were talking about was the mechanism for her to join the collective and become even closer to the community than she had been before (presumably, something she would have aspired to anyway, pre-infection).
That’s a nice way of setting up the potential conflicts. And I do hope that we see some more factions develop (I honestly don’t know which side Vegas guy might come down on, but I would be surprised if someone didn’t turn militant anti-Carolist and ask We to arm them so that they could save We, similar to how the group bad been trying to talk through how they might help solve the food shortage for We).
Byt the way, does that do it for anyone else? Using “We” as a proper noun for the collective? It’s how the collective instinctively self-identifies. As good a candidate for a name as any other…