“Calm your tits” is the hill you choose, and yet you need to make the point that you aren’t wearing panties?
Ohhhhkay…
I didn’t NEED to make the point that I typically don’t wear any, but it did seem relevant in anticipation of someone saying “don’t get your panties in a twist” as the next step beyond “calm your tits” (or taint as recently revised, though how taints are swollen with rage or how someone would happen to see the same in the normal course is anyone’s guess).
Way for the little brain to divert the big brain from the point of the post though. 
Yeah.
Oh wait. Nope. Firstly, I’m not interested in your panties, promise. And secondly, it’s an expression. It doesn’t need any literal interpretation, particularly one so clearly intended to titillate. Obviously they wouldn’t be literally twisted, so why must they be literal knickers?
But my taint isn’t swollen over it.
There was no suggestion that you were interested in my panties, and I figured you’d not fall for what was meant to be a ironic reference to the little brain. No one said anything *needs *a literal interpretation (either). We understand they are expressions, no? You may want to review what you said and circle back to explain the initial diversion, as though I’d somehow undercut the point by anticipating a remark about panties in a twist. I inquired whether males can be more creative with derision or denigration than tying it to femininity or body parts (whether tits or taint). I’ll conclude that the answer is “no”.
Oh, I have no disagreement with that at all. I agree that many of the most common pejoratives used toward men involve some connection to femininity, effeminacy, and/or wimminfolk in general. I also agree that it’s really stupid and should change. I admit to a blind spot regarding “motherfucker,” but otherwise I avoid such expressions pretty strictly.
I just find it amusing. Someone could say to you “Don’t get your knickers twisted” and you’d respond “I don’t wear any,” as though that ends the conversation? You must realize that such a response only serves to draw attention to your ladyparts, yes?
But it’s all good. My taint remains untwisted, and as a regular kiltwearer who has scant use for shorts myself, I wish you all the best of your unrestrained genitals.
Damn…I originally read it as “decided”. Not sure why. I’d still be trying to quash the warrant though.
Absolutely. As I understand it, this requires an injection into the penis itself. It’s hard to imagine anything more intrusive to privacy and bodily autonomy unless the warrant called for major surgery.
And what’s the probative value of the resulting picture going to be?
Special. Penis. Software.
So if there really is special penis-comparing software out there (which I very much doubt), someone had to have written this. I can only imagine how you’d describe it on your resume: “Last project: Wrote custom application to compare images of penises to identify sexting teenagers.”
So…you’re against it or for it? I can’t always tell with you. 
While we all have one so it’s gender neutral, “asshole” gets a lot of airing. Along with “putz,” “dick,” “dickhead,” and so on. Then there are the common Brit ejaculations of “balls” and “cock.” Lots of offensive masculine words. It’s just that women don’t notice them because they are too concentrated on being offended, alas!
You’re new here so I should be gentle, but you walked right into this one: Pics or it’s not true. 
Which means that somewhere out there is someone whose job it is to collect pictures of underage erections.
How would you put that on your resume?
What if she was dressed as a cop?
I worked for a small “family-friendly” web search site once. They didn’t offer results for pornographic searches but eventually decided that they could make money by redirecting such searches to another company. So they had a really long list of porno search terms (e.g., “big busty women”, although I’m guessing on that. They wouldn’t show me the actual list of terms). And they hired a temp to enter the list into the software. I was laughing as I imagined the phone call to the temp agency. “Hi. We need a person for a data entry job. No one who gets offended easily. Probably no one who is religious. Definitely someone with a strong stomach.”
Interesting response from the police:
It is not the policy of the Manassas City Police or the Commonwealth Attorney’s Office to authorize invasive search procedures of suspects in cases of this nature and no such procedures have been conducted in this case. Beyond that, neither the Police Department nor the Commonwealth’s Attorney’s Office discusses evidentiary matters prior to court hearings.
The Washington Post story indicates that the girl first sent photos to the boy, and the video was sent in response. The boy’s defense attorney Jessica Foster “said the case began when the teen’s 15-year-old girlfriend sent photos of herself to the 17-year-old, who in turn sent her the video in question. The girl has not been charged, and her mother filed a complaint about the boy’s video, Foster said.” But the press release from the police says, “On January 23, 2014 Manassas City Police was contacted by a parent of a 15 YOA female juvenile who was sent pornographic videos by a 17 YOA male suspect after repeatedly being told to stop.”
My guess is that the girl denied any involvement when her mother found out. If the boy still has her pictures on his phone, it might help his defense.
I wouldn’t be surprised. I’ve read articles in the past about incidents where to police produced child porn so they could use it in “sting” operations. Rather similar in nature to how they’ll sell teens drugs, get them addicted, and use the addiction, threat of prosecution for drug use or both to get the teen to cooperate in potentially fatal undercover work.
As a rule, cops are scum. Just a better organized gang with a nicer uniform and more resources.
sigh
Cites?
“Hello, Police? I’d like to register my son Billy on your Teenage Erection Database. Should I send a photo or movie of him whacking off, or does he have to come down and do it in person?”
Except for twins’, I suppose.
… and then THEY can face charges and go to jail for kiddy porn and other charges.