Which of the following two unlikely things would change the US the most if they actually were 100% successful in their aim?
Assume one or the other of these things will happen as of January, 2025.
If we implemented an iron-clad mandatory retirement age of 67 for all elected officials from lower court judges to the president of the United States. It would not be permissible to be elected to any office you’d hold beyond your 67th birthday if you served the full term of it, so you cannot bend the rules by running for senator at 66 years and 250 days without triggering a new election set for immediately before your birthday. The only exception would be that people elected prior to 2025 can finish their current term if older than 65 currently.
If we eliminated all paid lobbyists in a way strict enough to also make the change impossible to circumvent. At minimum it would be punishable by 2-3 year’s jail time for each person who is connected to an attempt to pay an allegedly unpaid activist in cash, services, or goods in order to get them to be your/your company’s mouthpiece. Repeat offenders and their co-conspirators would be sentenced to incrementally longer prison sentences.
Consider the degree of change as how much it would impact the lives of the people who live in this country. Not just the wealthy, not just the poor, not just the middle class, not just the business and finance classes, not just the working stiffs. But the degree of change that everyone as a whole would experience.
The bigger change would be:
a strict age limit of 67, and the change would be for the better
a strict age limit of 67, and the change would be for the worse
elimination of all lobbyists, and the change would be for the better
elimination of all lobbyists, and the change would be for the worse