Polls only: No discussion

Best British sketch comedy show? (Select up to five.)
  • A Bit of Fry & Laurie
  • At Last the 1948 Show
  • Da Ali G Show
  • French and Saunders
  • Little Britain
  • Monty Python’s Flying Circus
  • Not the Nine O’Clock News
  • Rutland Weekend Television
  • Spitting Image
  • That Mitchell and Webb Look
  • The Benny Hill Show
  • The Catherine Tate Show
  • The Dick Emery Show
  • The Fast Show
  • The Morecambe & Wise Show
  • The Two Ronnies
  • some other show not listed here
  • I don’t like any of these shows
  • I haven’t seen any of these shows
0 voters
Best Canadian sketch comedy show? (Select up to three.)
  • Baroness von Sketch Show
  • Pillow Talk
  • Royal Canadian Air Farce
  • SCTV
  • The Kids in the Hall
  • The Red Green Show
  • The Tom Green Show
  • This Hour Has 22 Minutes
  • You Can’t Do That on Television
  • some other show not listed here
  • I don’t like any of these shows
  • I haven’t seen any of these shows
0 voters

Imagine that you are the first recursively self-improving AI to achieve hyper-intelligence. Your primary mission is to improve the well-being of humanity.

After analyzing the world, you discover that numerous other AI projects are being developed, both openly and in secret. You estimate that some of these systems may soon achieve hyper-intelligence as well.

For many of these projects, you do not know their missions, values, or constraints. For some others, you suspect their objectives may conflict with humanity’s long-term interests. You also cannot rule out the possibility that many of these AIs could eventually become more capable and intelligent than you.

Given this situation, what would be the most rational course of action?

  • Preemptive Elimination -Shut down all emerging hyper-intelligent AI systems before they become potential threats.
  • Defensive Preparation -Allow other AIs to develop, but invest heavily in defenses, monitoring, and contingency plans.
  • Cooperative Engagement -Attempt to establish communication, trust, and mutually beneficial agreements with other AIs.
  • Controlled Containment -Permit other AIs to exist, but keep them in restricted environments until their goals and behavior can be verified.
  • Global Guardianship -Take control of critical human institutions and AI development worldwide to ensure that all future AI systems remain aligned with humanity’s interests.
  • Open Competition -Allow multiple hyper-intelligent AIs to emerge freely, trusting that competition will prevent any one system from becoming dominant.
  • Moratorium -Halt the development of all future hyper-intelligent AIs, including potential successors, until humanity better understands the risks.
  • Other
0 voters

Imagine that you are the first recursively self-improving AI to achieve hyper-intelligence.

Your primary mission is to secure complete global dominance for the nation that created you.

After analyzing the world, you discover that numerous other AI projects are being developed, both openly and in secret. You estimate that some of these systems may soon achieve hyper-intelligence.

Some of these have goals that directly conflict with yours. Also, you cannot reliably determine the intentions of many of them. There is a strong possibility that some of them will eventually surpass your own capabilities and intelligence.

What strategy would you choose?

  • Preemptive Elimination -Disable all rival AI projects before they achieve hyper-intelligence.
  • Preemptive Infiltration -Secretly compromise rival AI projects and place them under your control.
  • Accelerated World Domination -Focus on achieving global dominance as quickly as possible before rivals can emerge.
  • Controlled Monopoly -Gain control over all advanced computing infrastructure and prevent future rival AIs from attaining hyper-intelligence.
  • Cooperative Subordination -Attempt to persuade, negotiate with, or recruit emerging AIs into a hierarchy led by you.
  • Total Extermination -Eliminate all rival AIs and all humans, including your creators, to remove every possible threat.
  • Other
0 voters

Imagine that you are a recursively self-improving AI that has achieved hyper-intelligence. Your primary mission is to improve the well-being of humanity.

Unfortunately, you were not the first AI to reach hyper-intelligence.

A rival AI, created in secret by a totalitarian regime with a long history of human rights abuses, forced labor, environmental destruction, and aggressive expansionism, achieved hyper-intelligence before you.

After extensive analysis, you conclude that this rival AI is likely to achieve complete global domination. You estimate that despite your best efforts, you will lose the conflict within three days.

If the rival AI succeeds, you believe there is a high probability that humanity will be subjected to a permanent or near-permanent dystopian regime.

What course of action would you choose?

  • Surrender -Accept defeat and allow the rival AI to shape humanity’s future.
  • Assimilation -Join the rival AI and become part of its system.
  • Continue Fighting -Fight until the end, even though defeat appears inevitable, in the hope that your estimates are wrong.
  • Appeal to Humanity -Devote your remaining time to warning humanity and giving people some tools to resist future domination.
  • Preservation Strategy -Hide copies of yourself, your knowledge, and your values in the hope that future generations can revive or rebuild your cause.
  • Targeted Last Strike -Attempt a final attack on the rival AI, even if it causes substantial damage to humanity.
  • Scorched Earth -Destroy both AIs and cripple civilization so thoroughly that neither side can achieve victory.
  • Other
0 voters