Negative gun news gets quite a bit of attention in media and on this board. There’s a whole thread in the Pit that is over 6,200 posts and counting. This is a thread to bring up another aspect of gun ownership - positive news. I post it in this forum instead of in the Pit since it really is not any kind of statistical analysis, just mindless data points to share. Hopefully people can add their own positive news items relating to firearms.
I’m glad he got pardoned but it is weirdly ignorant to think it was OK to carry a gun across state borders without worry. The North East is “notoriously liberal” and anti-gun after all. Seems like maybe gun owners should take at least as tough a test as car drivers need to get a license and this type of stuff could be covered in it. Not exact rules for 50 states but that guns laws are at a state level and you should check before bringing loaded guns to other states.
That is both misleading and wrong. There was no life-threatening disaster, just storm-related outages. He wasn’t a good Samaritan volunteering his own time to alleviate human suffering. He was hired to do rather routine repairs, that’s all.:rolleyes:
I don’t know what New Jersey law calls for in a case like this, but on the surface, I agree that arresting and jailing him was unnecessarily harsh, and if justice were to be served, he’d get some sort of recompense for it. But there’s no reason to falsely win more sympathy for him, especially when he was naive and/or stupid in not knowing the law.
Two blocks from my house there is (or possibly was, it’s not clear if they are going to be back in business) a small shop selling scooters (not sure what kind of scooters, it’s a tiny shop that I never noticed). Last Sunday at 8:00 am four guys tried to break in and steal stuff. Unfortunately for them, the owner was there and armed. He shot and killed one of them; the others ran and escaped.
No cite because the case is still open and the police aren’t saying anything. But I saw the incident tape when I drove by a little later, and the store is now boarded up. I got the details from our local Nextdoor board, and to some extent it was confirmed last night at our neighborhood police liaison meeting.
I completely sympathize with anyone who has to shoot another human being to protect his life, or his family, or even his livelihood.
The other day, I shot a soft rubber ball (about the size of a billiard ball) off the top of a beer bottle, without hitting/breaking the bottle, at a range of about 60 yards with my .22 Glenfield. Took two shots at it. Nailed it the second shot. I was shooting clay targets that somebody left up on the hill from the same range, but it started getting too easy. And I never have a shortage of beer bottles.
From my perspective, the only positive news in this entire thread is Gatopescado’s. When I saw the thread title, I was trying to think what I would consider positive gun news, and came up with target shooting and successful legal hunting of non-endangered animals.
People dying prematurely and violently, even if they were in the process of committing a crime, is not positive, it’s a tragedy. We do not have the death penalty for burglary, and I don’t even think it’s appropriate for armed robbery. People who might have had a chance at being a positive influence in the world are dead. Their families are mourning them. There’s nothing positive about that.
If I said he flew in on the back of a unicorn while spreading good will with the Care Bears, that would also be misleading and wrong. But since I didn’t state that there was a life threatening disaster, or that he was volunteering, your assessment isn’t on point.
Whether we have the death penalty for those crimes or not doesn’t matter. People who want to be a positive influence in the world can start with an easy one: Don’t commit crimes, especially violent crimes, against other people. From there, they can move on to feeding the hungry, clothing the naked, and so on. See how that works?
For the most part we are “gosh, I sure hope I never have to use my weapon.” But because mass murderers and common criminals are so often used as examples of why I shouldn’t have a firearm, I don’t see any harm in someone giving examples of why I possibly should have one.
And while specific examples elude me this AM, there have been several examples of Positive Abortion Stories given here over the years. Not in a dedicated thread, I will admit, but people giving examples of why they made that choice and the benefit they felt it brought.
Call me crazy, but “disaster relief worker” implies to me someone who works to relieve the suffering of people caused by a disaster. They often selflessly volunteer to do it because there aren’t enough people with the official job description of “disaster relief worker”. I suppose some could infer it to mean a selfish mercenary profiting from the misfortune of others, but to each his own subjective interpretation.
Regardless of what it means to anyone, there was no disaster; ergo, there was no disaster relief; ergo, he wasn’t a disaster relief worker, so why did you refer to him as one? I assume you didn’t see him as a selfish mercenary.