Positive Gun News of the Day

In other news, Police: Homeowner Fights Back Against Home Invaders

DGU with 1 death. 2 attackers impersonating police and the resident prevailed, though another resident seems to have suffered a heart attack while being beaten.

Wut? He mussed their hair?

To make him look presentable before shooting him, for the police photos. It’s the polite thing to do, dontcha know.

GA so in a lot of the South we will say tussled if it is just a short fist fight with no big injuries & this is what the reporter was saying, wrong in this case even if he got the right word. He was probably tired of saying, ‘fighting or fought’ because his editor was on his behind about grabbing readers attention.

… or not …

Yeah’ I assume the reporter used the wrong word and spellcheck didn’t complain…

I saw a person on Judge Judy one time say, “Me and him commenced to tussle.”

In other news, Police Say Fatal Garland Shooting Was Self-Defense

DGU with one death. I wouldn’t advise exiting the house generally. Though cutting the security camera wire is a sign of being up to no good.


In other news, Homeowner pulls gun on would-be thieves, deputies say

DGU with no injuries. Based on what they were stealing, these guys seem like idiots.

In other news, Suspect Shot, Killed During Store Robbery in Deerfield Beach: BSO

DGU with one death. The numbers were flipped in this incident than what has been posted before. This time it was one armed robber vs. two armed employees and it ended up with the robber being shot multiple times and dying.

Snappy, indeed!

In other news,

DGU with no deaths. 2v1 and the one prevailed, hitting each of the robbers twice. It seems the older of the two robbers is a felon and was on parole.

That was in Chicago IL’s Calumet Heights, on the south side. I found a link: Two Charged After Being Shot During Attempted Robbery Of Calumet Heights Store - CBS Chicago

Mr. Luckey was shot in the groin, among other places. He apparently deserved it. Not so lucky was that Luckey.

Oops, forgot the link. Yes, that’s the one.

Easy to find, with the text you provided.

In other news, Man shot by Ark. homeowner during alleged robbery

DGU with no deaths. 2v1 and the one prevailed. Apparently it was an acquaintance, though I’d be hard pressed to open the door at 11pm at night. Another instance where the robber was shot and able to get himself to a hospital.

The NRA has instituted a 20-day waiting period and an 18-page application…to be able to access its Eddie Eagle mascot costume.

Good job, NRA! You are keeping America safe from attacks by unauthorized Eddie Eagle impersonators.

This is an official warning. Stop threadshitting. If you want to start your own thread about what is in the link go right ahead. Or post it in the omnibus Pit thread. Since you started the ATMB thread about this one you obviously are doing this to make a point. Cut it out. Stay away from this thread if it is bothering you so much that it is making you break the rules.

Edit: After discussing this with the poster I will clarify. Posting a clip which is anti-NRA but is not related to this thread is more of a hijack than a threadshit. More importantly it goes against the previous instruction in this thread (and the discussion in the ATMB thread) to not turn this into a debate about gun control or Pit of the NRA. As with any instructions we don’t need to name each individual poster to let you know that further hijacks will not be allowed.

In other news, Good Samaritan helps detain armed robber at Anchorage 5th Avenue mall

DGU with no injuries. Is it just me, or is it normal to expect a high ratio of people being armed in Alaska?

Yes, but also, there’s no limit to stupidity.

The wildlife there is a little more dangerous than elsewhere, is it not? And do not many more people there go hunting?

True on both counts. Plus, with the wide open spaces and distances, you can’t exactly count on police being just around the corner. In addition, Alaska and Vermont were the original two “constitutional carry” states where you didn’t need government permission to carry either openly or concealed.

I don’t understand this statement, or to what it refers. In a general sense, it’s probably a truism, but I don’t get the reference.