So presumably then you should spend Fridays outside mosques evangelizing to those going in. Telling them they were going to hell and worshipping a false god? Or do other religions soul-harming actions get a pass?
The anti-abortion brigade often refers to pregnancy as a temporary or minor inconvenience, and believes that adoption is THE answer to an unwanted pregnancy. Cause we all know that women, first and foremost, are baby-making machines.
ETA: For an absolute abortion fundamentalist nightmare, read the story of Nancy Klein.
Out of interest, how do you call someone’s depressed wife a murderer and accuse them of being an accessory to murder without it being “in a rude manner”?
Marley23, villa, Zsofia, PlainJain, Mr LeMay has taken an important step forward in acknowledging his behavior. This is a step that many on this board, even in this thread, have strongly wished for. Perhaps we can encourage him by acknowledging his advance in self awareness, instead of immediately chiming in with reasons why it is inadequate or incomplete.
So, something like 35 states will prosecute someone who murders a pregnant woman of double homocide. Are yous aying that we add that second charge of homocide because of teh emotional distress caused by the loss of the fetus? :dubious:
If the child is not a human life, why isn’t the murderer just charged with one homocide (and perhaps an appendectomy)?
To use your analogy, we call rape “rape” because an actual rape occurred. if only unauthorized rubbing had occurred, we wouldn’t call it rape. but in this case, you are saying we are calling something murder even though murder didn’t actually occur (just the termination of a pregnancy) because it causes emotional distress?
The first amendment is what gives people the right to petition their government. It is also an amendment that has formed the basis for many of our cultural values.
but you’re right, I’m not sure why I thought it was an appropriate cite for this situation…
I thought the visit occurred after the angel came and told Mary that she was pregnant with the Son of God. I don’t remember where I read it but the leaping by John fetus was (I thought) due to the rpesence of Jesus.
[Leviticus says that the penalty for killing a woman’ fetus is just a fine, by the way. It does not consider it to be murder.
[/QUOTE]
Leviticus says that the penalty for klilling a child up to 5 years of age is a fine. Is your point that the old testament drew a line that we would not draw today?
“Leviticus 27:6
If the person is from a month old up to five years old, your valuation shall be…”
I’m not going to pretend the issue is cut and dried, no. Treating an embryo or a fetus as a person is ridiculous, treating it as nothing even close to a person is going too far in support of an argument that does not require it. But the answer to your question is politics. For a politician it’s easy to vote against an anti-abortion law but it’s almost impossible to vote against a law imposing harsher penalties on people who kill pregnant women.
And lo, the garden of my father isn’t for candy-asses who thinketh the prequel trilogy has redeeming factors ; for verily I tell thee, Empire was the the best of them, and George Lucas he did not have a hand in it.