Public relations director fails at public relations.

Some of you may have seen that the Twitterverse, and the internet more generally, has a new Outrage of the Day to focus on.

A woman by the name of Justine Sacco, making a business trip to South Africa, posted the following on her Twitter account just before her plane left London for Capetown:

Nice!

Of course, as has become common practice in cases like this, the online reaction was swift and merciless. The tweet became an instant sensation, and Sacco was vilified from all corners of the globe. Even worse, as Gawker so nicely put it, the fact that she was on a twelve-hour international flight gave “the internet an inordinate amount of time to gather its torches.”

The hashtag #HasJustineLandedYet was attached to the story on Twitter, and when Justine did, in fact, land, an enterprising young South African man even managed to interview her waiting father and grab a picture of her.

Anyway, while i find the story vageuly amusing, in the usual internet-catastrophe sort of way, i didn’t really open the thread to pile on the woman for the content of her message. Plenty of morons post stupid and offensive things on the internet, and if i got worked up about all of them, i’d develop an ulcer. There’s not much on the web that shocks me anymore.

What does amaze me, though, is that this woman’s job is (was?) global Director of Communications for IAC, a large company with extensive media holdings, including TV stations, internet video service Vimeo, and dating sites Match.com and OKCupid.

Yes, she is in public relations. Her whole job, her whole career, revolves around creating and controlling the public image of her company and the people within it. This is someone who, presumably, has to sign off on things like media releases, interviews, statements, and other brand-related publicity in an effort to construct the best possible image for her company and its products.

Did this person not consider, even for a moment, the consequences of making a public statement that not only made light of AIDS in Africa, but doubled down by explicitly racializing the problem and implying that, for someone white, it wasn’t a concern? Jesus Christ on a Cracker.

The folks at Gawker suggest that “a bad AIDS joke likely won’t keep a good PR person down for too long,” but if i were an employer looking for a PR person, it’s not actually the joke itself that would be my biggest concern. I’d be more worried about hiring a PR director who apparently has no clue about how public relations works on the internet.

I can see her at a meeting to roll out a new product: “OK, so we’ve got the TV advertising all set up. As for social media, just go ahead and tweet whatever dumb idea comes into your head. We’ll deal with the fallout later.” Genius!

Yup, beyond stupid. Your subject line pretty much says it all. What really amazes me is, as you say, I’ll bet after the fallout is over everyone will just go back to business as usual.

What’s that old adage…bad publicity is better than no publicity?

See, I have now heard the name Justine Sacco and the company IAC, both which would have missed my radar by many lightyears otherwise. Perhaps tweeting such a phenomenally dumb comment as she did might have been in fact contrived to attract media attention.

Bullshit. Bad publicity is definitely worse than good publicity, and no PR hack is going to get far by telling the boss “My plan is to make us look like insensitive bigots with a planted tweet and wait 12 hours before following up so that the media can get a hold of the story. Everyone will be talking about us-win/win!”

Most people in PR are mediocre minds at best, ending up there because that’s the best they can do with their background and brainpower. They start off in communications or business or media, all of which have strong career possibilities, and end up in the doughy slushpile of networking and media-jerking… PR. I’ve run into a few brilliant minds in the field, but they are one in a thousand at best. To do well in PR, you have to bring something to it more than waitron or whoring skills refined by a slushy, formless degree… but that’s what most in the field are, host/esse/s with a diploma, one drink away from giving blowjobs for publicity purposes.

I see what you did there.

For the focal person, perhaps, sometimes. But overall, Sam Goldfish was right.

Wow. Harsh.

But not completely wrong - it’s easy to declare yourself an “expert” in PR, and many practitioners quite simply don’t get it. I try very hard to hammer the point home when I am training the soldiers I work with - you are never “off”. Once in uniform, everything you say or do can reflect on that uniform. It’s the same if you work in Communications.

I think she gets it now.

I’ve worked with (and suffered) far too many second- through tenth-raters to have any gentler opinion.

I am at the blessed point of freedom where halfway through a meeting with a business owner who wants me to come in and completely change everything to be exactly the way it hasn’t worked for 25 years, I can say, “Excuse me, I have something important to do” and go play with my dog. The ones that will listen, even a little, without insisting that they’ve never made a wrong move of any kind, get my 110%… and learn to value it. There is always a point at which they blow up because they grasp how much money and time they spent on useless, counterproductive bullshit, misled by fools and charlatans and whores with dime-store credentials.

When this happened I immediately thought of the PR head at a local company where I know some of their employees. They report that he is so thoroughly stupid they can’t believe hr makes it to work every day wearing pants. And this guy leads his department of equally clueless flacks. I could definitely see him or one of his lackeys doing this.

Bad publicity might arguably be good if you’re selling cars or computers. But when your business is selling publicity, then bad publicity just lets everyone know you’re bad at doing your job.

She has been fired, cue the outrage for denial of free speech.

IMO, “Even bad publicity is still publicity” is a lie told by advertising and PR folks to justify still billing the customer even if they completely fuck up.

Twitter: Extinguishing careers one tweet at a time.

At least it’s helping hold people accountable for their rampant stupidity. I hold no hope that it’s helping with their racism and general assholishness, but MAYBE twitter fallout can help people learn to keep their stupid to themselves more often.

Apologies for the double-post, but the Breitbart article makes me want to scream.

Actually, it might blow his little mind, but I don’t mind him (or anyone else) looking at my personal online accounts associated with my actual real name and real job, and contacting my employer over my content published there.

In fact, I’m relatively certain that even if he did, with the most controversial statements I have there, I won’t get fired over it. Why? Because I’m intelligent enough to realize that people judge me by what I put out there! If it’s not proper enough to say when I’m on the desk at my workplace,** it doesn’t go on the internet associated with my real name.** Hell, half the time, it doesn’t even go on the internet under one of my throwaway accounts.

Shit, people, if you work in the public eye, and you are on the internet, then your internet activity is in the public eye, and it is very possible that you’ll get judged and held accountable for it IN REAL LIFE.

Why is this such a difficult concept for people?

Probably not. Quite a few people don’t seem to understand that Twitter is “public” in the first place. People have even screwed themselves over by boasting of crimes on Twitter.

I read somewhere that her dad is a South African billionaire. Which doesn’t surprise me for some reason.

It’s actually worse, since you are actually putting it out there in text, associated with your name. I try to tell people - if you wouldn’t want it on the front page/top story then don’t put it online…

I could tell so many stories…it can be so ridiculous

Demonstrably wrong. There are decades of marketing research that confirms that “any publicity is good publicity” unless it’s of the Three Mile Island scale. People hear the name over and over and eventually retain nothing except that branding, so when it occurs on a shelf or in a list of choices, they tend to select it.

This person is screwed, but the company she’s associated with will get only neutral to positive results from the news splash… after this week’s hit. The small number of people who will remember why they remember the name/brand doesn’t affect the outcome. That’s how it works.

Wouldn’t it be awesome if people took it to the logical goal of not being stupid in the first place?

(Why, yes, I am still young and naive…)