You want perspective? Consider this.
Both chemical and biological weapons of one sort or another have been part of warfare since it has been recorded. It has also been viewed with near universal revulsion. If I recall correctly, Thucydides records that the Athenians hunted a Thracian tribe to near-extinction largely because they used poisoned arrows, which was considered barbaric by the Greeks. This happened at almost the exact same time that the Athenians decimated the island of Melos simply to show to other peoples that they could. Biological “warfare” against non-eurasian peoples, both inadvertant and completely intentional, accounted for millions upon millions of deaths in Australia, North and South America, and the Pacific islands.
After the Pandora’s box of chemical warfare was re-opened in the First World War, most nations agreed to prohibit the use of chemical and biological weapons. Germany was expressly forbidden from researching chemical weapons in Article 171 of the Treaty of Versailles. They were considered so terrible that the Second World War, by far the bloodiest and most inhumane conflict in human history, was virtually free of the use of chemical and biological weapons.
Virtually free. In 1942, Reinhard Heydrich, SS “Protector” of Czechoslovakia and widely perceived potential heir to Adolf Hitler, survived an assassination attempt but died shortly thereafter from complications which are variously attributed to infected debris from his own uniform, or either botulism or anthrax supplied to Czech assassins by British agents. German retribution included the execution of the entire male population of the village of Lidice, Cz. Use of biotoxins was cited as one of the reasons for the punitive liquidation.
Since the end of the Second World War, the United States has promised everything from “response in kind” to “overwhelming” response to anyone who would dare to use NBC agents against it. And up to now, it worked.
Just look at the fear and panic a poorly constructed and distributed bioweapon has caused in the past few weeks. The fear and panic isn’t about this particular fumbling attempt, it’s because someone has dared to do it. The floodgates are open, the blueprints are spread out for other, more competent people to follow, and the entire world is in as much danger as they ever have been.
The only thing that has prevented this sort of thing from happening sooner* is the promise of total destruction of the first parties to use them. Why does history show that the traditional response to chemical and biological warfare is enormous, out-of-proportion, bloodthirsty response? Because we are and have always been scared shitless of this sort of thing. Our responses have been intended to dissuade generations of people from using these things. That’s how scared about 'em we are.
Well, now the world is a confusing enough place that individuals can get hold of and use these agents, and their parent nations appear to be able to escape the promised apocalyptic retribution for their use.
Chances are, if you have and are using a computer, you have enough regular contact with the rest of the world that you are susceptible to the indiscriminate use of a bioweapon.
And soon every jerk, creep, asshole, and psycho in the world will know where to look up the information needed to procure and spread such a weapon. We are either doomed to total destruction or doomed to emulating the vicious retributions of the past in a possibly futile attempt to contain the use of such weapons. And I’m not very damned happy about either prospect.
- It would appear as if another biological attack against Americans took place in the early 1990s, but it was so poorly executed that it took years to discover the details. I’ll find a citation.