No, I don’t have to wear horshoes, I wear a size 13. Sketchers seem to fit best.
And no, it isn’t always hot down here. It snows for a month during the year, and boy, the elecritcal bills go way up when you gotta pay to keep the heat up at the “Inferno” setting.
I am going to reply semi-seriously. Yes, I am aware that these posts are joking.
The image of Satan as ‘cloven-hooved’ or horned or anything like that comes mainly from a composite of Greek images of nymphs or other half-beast mythological beings. As such, that conception of Satan pre-dates horse shoes.
In the Christian tradition, Satan is just the leader of the fallen angels. So he looks much like other angles (what does an angel look like?), except that he got burned up pretty badly when the big guy threw him in a lake of fire.
Sorry to interrupt the laughter, but I thought it was actually an interesting question.
Y’know, I like this thread. On the other hand, it’s not really factual, so it doesn’t fit in too well in GQ. It would fit in perfectly in IMHO, though, so I’m moving it.
I’m not going to try to speak for the Christian perspective, but I’ve heard that some Jews see Satan as “God’s QA department”; his purpose is to test humanity to be sure that they’re really righteous and whatnot.
Somebody better versed in these matters can either correct or confirm what I just said.
I believe the traditional Christian answer would be “pride”. “Better to reign in hell than serve in heaven” (Paradise Lost, Book i, line 261) and all that. The article from the 1908 Catholic Encyclopedia on the Devil discusses the question at some length:
The Romans did invent a kind of horseshoe, the hipposandal, that had Greek roots. So it’s possible for even the earliest representations of the Bad’un to show him shod.
But I’ve never seen this, so my answer would be: no. Stepping on thorns and splitting hooves is just one more tiny bit of punishment.