Sounds like you have a philosophically different approach than the other moms. And they have some learning to do. First time moms, most of them?
Some home truths from my planet (crosses with both theirs and yours):
-
Breastfeeding is great. I love it. If I was on meds for my health that were not safe for my child (though a remarkable number of them are perfectly safe - I always check the reference in Medicines and Human Milk first - some are truly not), I would regret not being able to breastfeed. I would not feel guilty. Do not let them make you feel either guilt (a reaction saying that you knew better and did something bad anyway), or shame (feeling like you, yourself, are bad, not related to just your actions). Feeling regret for not being able to do otherwise, either through technical fact or lack of knowledge is a ‘clean’ feeling. It requires nothing of you, no action, no remediation. You may wish to redeem any losses you feel by educating others (including this mom’s group). It will make other womens’ lives better if these women do not look down on those who make rational, reasonable choices about breastfeeding. It will also do them the favor of making them expand their horizons beyond their ‘safe’ zone.
-
While it is true that moms who are closely bonded (secure attachment) with their kids have a horrible reaction to hearing their child cry (can’t bear it), this has not been demonstrated to be true for ‘leaving the child in a happy state’. That is, if your baby is happy with someone else, caregiver, SAHD, In-laws, leaving them content in that situation is not a sign of bad parenting and ineffective attachment, it is a sign of security. I recall being asked by a SAHM (who sounds much like this group) if I wasn’t afraid the baby would love my husband more than me if he stayed home. Like it was a competition, and being loved ‘best’ was the reward for being a good mom. It was clear to me that this mom was insecure about her own value as a mom, and her proof that she was a good mom was being loved best. Now, I’m all for adding security to the major mind-whack that new parenting involves, but not at the expense of the other major player in the child’s life - daddy/partner/co-parent. I still have to explain to those who don’t ‘get’ me working that my husband was better at staying home, that I tend to dissociate and get depressed when I stay home, and that depression in a primary caregiver is a serious problem for the child’s long-term mental health - it damages the attachment bond. So I’m more capable of being a strongly attached mom BY working. It takes some digesting for those who assume that attachment bonds ‘just happen’ because of proximity, and are not to do with either effort or situation, let alone maternal capacity and mental state, but the neurobiology basis of my being a better parent because I work is sound. Plus, I have more focus and energy for my child, personally, if I work. I get to switch tracks and really focus on being a parent at home.
-
My husband (when he was a SAHD) had to coach me at times when my son’s cries changed. Sometimes I didn’t know what the new cry meant, and he did. I felt out of it, behind the game. I realized that’s what most men feel like - struggling to keep up with the changes is rough. It also meant that my husband was closely attuned to my son’s reactions. That was mighty cool.
I also pass on to you one of the best reactions I got from another mom when he quit to stay home: “wow, you’ll never have a husband who comes home at the end of the day and asks why ‘nothing is done’, if all you had to do was ‘watch the kid’…” You’ve got yourself a man who will know exactly how much work it is to take care of a child, who will grant you the extra time if you are the one in charge (say, weekends or maternity leave), and will be glad that your child is happy, fed, and played with first and foremost. You can’t buy that. I know too many moms whose husbands don’t ‘get’ how much effort goes into childcare, and who grouse about it constantly, even to the point of contemplating divorce.
-
Lesson number 235 in parenthood. If you take up all the parenting space, the other parent cannot become the parent they should be. And kids seem IME to do better with parents who are not clones, but who have different and unique things to offer. It was a grace (even if mortifying at first) for me to realize that there were things my husband could do that I could not replicate, such as walking our son to sleep. It was also a grace to realize the same in reverse. We were a constellation, not a line betwen two points, with an outlier. The three of us (and later, the four of us) all had unique relationships with each other. Me with husband, me with child, husband with child. Each dyad has something unique about it, and something valuable. And each triad, too, and the four of us as a unit, beyond that. By keeping myself OUT of the husband with child dyad, he got to develop it into something that wasn’t just a duplicate of the mommy with child dyad. That also let us have a huge range of dynamics, when our next son came along. And I learned some valuable parenting lessons from him. Now, years later, he can catch me doing things he knows I don’t want to do, and I can listen to him when he mentions them without feeling put down by an inferior. He is my true peer in parenting, better at some things, not as good at others, and yet always WITH me as a parent, making me a better one. It sounds like you are on the same track. You have given yourself an extra method of improvement that moms who don’t leave room for dad don’t give themselves. Plus, you’ve got a spouse who won’t feel he’s a failure before he’s even started.
-
Neurobiologically, IIRC, infants bond with up to six people in their first year. Beyond six, and they start having difficulty with bonding, but they can and do bond - have organized attachment behavior with - as many as six people. Fathers are usually person two. If they are given the chance to work it out. While some dads aren’t interested in kids under 1-2 years old, that may be because they aren’t expected to be, even by themselves.
-
With a SAHD, you get a better balance of parenting, IME. That is, when you get home, do you take over babycare fully? Bet you do. Gives daddy a true break after a day of baby-care. How many daddies take over fully from SAHMs when they get home from work?
-
It takes time to re-evaluate and re-balance the relationship and family dynamics after baby arrives. I found it very very useful to have date nights to help me reconnect, talk out the changes in who I was, establish the changes in who my husband was, re-set our expectations, re-set our priorities, etc. Much easier than working it out more slowly and with less free time to actually talk. I know it works out without date nights, too, but boy, the date nights were a help for us. Granted, since I was exclusively breastfeeding, it was less easy to do early on, so we didn’t do overnights until 10 months with Gabe, and almost 2 years with Brendan (my mom is older, and I wanted to give her the chance to sleep all night, instead of waking early with a hungry child). But we still did evenings from pretty early on, too. Yay for breastpumps. Keeping my relationship strong is a valuable thing to give my child, too. It is that constellation thing again. We’re all important, and all the bonds are important.
Anyway, it sounds like you’ve got a sense of youself as a good mom back, a bit. You are doing rather well, I think. My husband took over for me in the mom’s group, actually, and that helped the others deal better - they saw him as a real parent, not just an adjunct to the mom-and-baby set. He didn’t always participate in the conversations (breastfeeding wasn’t a good topic for his participation, say), but he could relate to the behaviors, and the general care and love shown to the kids helped the other moms get a better grip on the concept of a father as a bonded caregiver.
Also, just staying in the field may give the other moms a lesson. My SIL was a SAHM for all five of her kids. Loved it. Couldn’t imagine how a well-bonded mom could work. She liked me, but was afraid for my kids. Daycare ruined kids, working moms weren’t good at understanding their kids, etc. But we talked, and she saw me parent, and she watched my son growing up into a decent, bonded, loving, polite, kind, intelligent, and well-behaved young man. She finally admitted to me that she had thought it was the details of the parenting, the working, the daycare (after my husband returned to work at a year), etc., that caused ‘all those problem kids’… but having seen me do it, she realized that her assumption had been in error. Perhaps there was something in the parenting details that was the problem in those other families. That also opened her eyes to accepting that some of her SAHM contacts were awful parents, and it wasn’t in spite of being a SAHM, it was simply a separate issue entirely. It was the attachment, the responsiveness, the consistency, the reliability, the empathy, and the general parenting skills (rule setting, boundaries, rational/logical consequences, etc.), NOT whether they worked or stayed home. It was a big lesson for her. I’m glad she had the chance to learn it from me. (Not that you need to do this - you aren’t required to educate anyone, but I like it when I can…)