As has been pointed out several times that the photos/film are from Belsen, not a ‘death camp’ and not even a work camp, and that at the end of the war 35,000 prisoners died of typhus. USHMM documentation was supplied. The photos/film were made by the Brits at the end of the war and show typhus victims.
Some of those pictures are not of well-fed people. But even if some are, what does this prove? That some prisoners got enough to eat? That does nothing to discount the mountains of proof of mass starvation in the camps.
Whether or not some prisoners died of typhus does nothing to discount the enormous amount of evidence of others that were murdered and starved.
You fail, again and again. You offer nothing new- nothing that has not been debunked time and time again. You peck at the edges, and even those pecks are laughable. Whether or not some people lied, and whether or not some prisoners were not starved and not murdered, there are confessions, eyewitness accounts (which you have pointedly ignored), and physical evidence by the truckload.
You are deceived- and it seems pretty likely that you want to be deceived. What if it’s true- what if the accounts of my great grandfather, and the relatives of so many others here, are actually true?
On top of that what Gack is doing is to ignore that by the end of the war several camp inmates were recent or new arrivals. In fact it is clear to me that in a few pictures they did not had yet the uniforms that they would had gotten soon if they had not been lucky to be liberated then.
Of course, that’s a special kind of bullshit - the only surviving witnesses of mass exterminations are going to be SS, Einsatz scum. But post-VE day, any SS, Einsatz-scum is going to be on trial for their lives, on account of having murdered semi-random innocents by the fucking traincar-load. Ergo, none of their testimony is valid. Ergo, no Holocaust !
I would furthermore assume Jewish survivors’ testimony would be invalid on two counts, first for being filthy lying Jew scum, and second for having survived ergo there must not have been any system whatsoever in place to murder them ?
Well that’s obvious, and has been obvious, and will remain obvious until people wisen up. What people has, from time immemorial, benefitted from international friendship AND international stife ? What pond filth, what utter scum has always been at the heart of every conspiracy ? Who benefits from yet another crime ? I’ll tell you who.
The French.
There is no mystery here, the Jews were put in camps because it was Hitler’s intention to move them all out of Europe. First he encouraged Jewish immigration, but when that was not getting the job done the decision was made to round them up and ship them east. Some of the organizational details of this plan are given in the minutes taken at the Wannsee conference. When the Nazis started losing the war in the east the plan became unworkable and the Jews became stranded in camps. There were some 42,000 Jewish ghettos and Nazi camps where the Nazis effectively imprisoned the Jews
OK, so an article from 1906 mentions that “Russia’s 6,000,000 Jews” are in extreme danger, and that a certain Dr. Paul Nathan fears “renewed massacres exceeding in extent and terror all that have gone before.” And then more than a decade later, in the wake of WWI, another article mentions that six million Jew are lacking for bread, and risk death by starvation.
Is that it?
Between 1906 and WWII, a period of more than thirty years, the entirety of a global Jewish misinformation campaign preparing the way for the greatest hoax in history, was a measly two articles, published more than a decade apart…?
I would also like to know why you think that the specific number “six million” was chosen in the first place. Why not three, or four, or ten, or twenty? I couldn’t help but notice that your first link - to the 1906 article - includes a link to yet another article, named “The Kabalistic-Occult origins and purpose of the Holocaust™ dogma, and the 6 million number.” Is this what you believe? That the number was chosen because of its supposed “Kabalistic-Occult” origin?
