Questions about Hitler and Nazi Germany's attempted extermination of Europe's Jews

To be more precise you are talking about the death rate of Western Allies in German POW camps. Soviet POWs were the second largest group of victims of the holocaust, with a mortality rate of 57%. Slavs were scarcely a step above Jews as subhumans in Nazi ideology, and the whole point of the war for Hitler was to seize lebensraum in the east for the German people. Those who happened to be living there were to be killed, exiled towards Siberia, or reduced to illiterate slavery. See Generalplan Ost:

Horseshit. The big killers at the camps were Zyklon B, being deliberately worked to death and intentional starvation. From here regarding Nazi treatment of Soviet POWS:

Further:

So much for the Nazis taking all measures to combat typhus. Quite the opposite, they deliberately provided minimal to no shelter to prisoners being fed on a starvation diet, outbreaks of typhoid and dysentery was both the obvious and the intended effect.

Further from the same cite:

  1. Deny that Hitler and the Nazis were all about killing Jews.
  2. Convince people Hitler and the Nazis weren’t all that bad.
  3. Make it possible for people like Hitler and the Nazis to get back into power.
  4. Start killing Jews again.

German POWs in the Soviet Union didn’t fare much better. From here.

Both sides were quite willing to abuse the prisoners of the other.

Which entirely misses the point. Holocaust denying Gack is of the opinion that none of the deliberate, systematic extermination of 12 million human beings by the Nazis actually happened. Further, the 3.3 million Soviet POWs murdered by the Nazis were killed in a deliberate policy to ethnically cleanse lebensraum in the East to make room for settlement by German colonists. Nazi atrocities certainly don’t excuse communist atrocities, but again that isn’t the point. Gack denies that these Nazi atrocities even occurred.

Calling both sides equally willing to abuse the prisoners of the other is also absurd. Between 13.9% and ~25% of German prisoners died in the hands of the Soviets as a result of being worked to death in Gulags up to 1956. This is most certainly a horrible and inexcuseable crime; and something Gack would prefer became a focus to avoid looking at what the Nazis did in the holocaust, which again he denies actually happened. In contrast 57% of Soviet POWs in Nazi hands died in a deliberate attempt to exterminate them for being racially undesirable in the much shorter time frame of 1941-45, with most occurring in an even shorter time frame. Notably, Soviet POWs were the first victims of Zyklon B, and (with bolding mine)

In addition to the anti-Semitic, pro-Nazi motives mentioned by others, believing in conspiracy theories makes people feel special - lets them feel that they can see the truth while the sheeplike masses cannot.

This is true even if the topic doesn’t happen to play into one’s personal bigotries, like faked moon landings or secret Shakespeares. Of course, if there’s a handy conspiracy theory about Jews, and one is already inclined to hate Jews… bonus.

I rather hoped professor Gack was up revising history all night. But I suppose even holocaust deniers need their rest.

The Nazis definitely exterminated a lot of Jews, but I wouldn’t be surprised to find out that the numbers where grossly exaggerated by the allies.

Do you know who else revised history?

Oh, look. Is it BOGO day already?

The Jewish population of Europe was 5 million less at the end of WWII than at the beginning. Where did they all go? On a really long vacation??

Not shockingly, this post is from the same poster.

It’d surprise me. There has been a great deal of research and scholarship on the subject in the intervening 70 years. While some estimates are likely high, there seems to be a consensus of a lowest figure of about 5,000,000 Jews killed under the Nazis. Do you believe this is grossly exaggerated?

Yeah, six million, five mill…what’s a few million among friends? The Nazis weren’t really all that bad if they didn’t kill ALL six million. Might only have been four. So I guess we should cut them some slack.

For what purpose, and why ?

The movies made by the US and the Brits were necessarily of camps in Germany, none of them ‘death camps’, as the Soviets liberated all the camps in Poland.

And why has the figure stood up to analysis by multiple independent historical researchers who had much more time to examine the data?

The relevance is that the photos/film shown by Oprah is from Belsen, and the pictures were of prisoners who died of typhus at the end of the war.

I’m up and have responded quickly to the posts to this point that seemed directly relevant to the photographic evidence.

However, now I have an appointment to visit a law library on another little project, and will be out till noon.

At that time I’ll summarize my argument thus far and move on to other topics, next … the gas chambers.

The prisoners who died of typhus in the camps were victims of the Holocaust.

So the photos and films referred to certainly showed victims of the Holocaust.

I’m mildly curious as to how this is relevant to the questions you were asked at the beginning of this thread.

They’re pretty simple questions, and shouldn’t require an attempt at a quasi-Socratic dialogue to answer.