And aren’t swamps the result of alligator shit?
Don’t rednecks get any credit?
What do you guys do when you’re trying to follow a conversation that you don’t understand?
Can you maybe explain that better?
It was a dark and stormy night. Suddenly, a shot rang out! A door slammed. The maid screamed. Suddenly, a pirate ship appeared on the horizon! While millions of people were starving, the king lived in luxury. Meanwhile, on a small farm in Kansas, a boy was growing up. A light snow was falling, and the little girl with the tattered shawl had not sold a violet all day. At that very moment, a young intern at City Hospital was making an important discovery. The mysterious patient in Room 213 had finally awakened. She moaned softly. Could it be that she was the sister of the boy in Kansas who loved the girl with the tattered shawl who was the daughter of the maid who had escaped from the pirates?
Are we allowed to use a mix of statements and questions?
Do you think that is a good idea?
Did it sound like I was supporting it?
I don’t know. I could go either way on it. On one hand, a series of statements followed by a question kind of violates the spirit of the game. On the other hand, when implemented correctly, it could be quite humorous. Perhaps we should put it to a vote?
Doesn’t “Questions Only” mean “Questions Only”?
Anyone else in favor?
Could this be a slippery slope?
Does that question apply to the presidential campaign?
God, isn’t it over yet?
Can you imagine if there was a Presidential election every four months instead of every four years?
Would you pass the brain bleach, please?
What would Pat Paulsen do?
Or Jim Webb?
Or Jack Webb?
Is Harold Stassen running this year?