When I click on a link, how can I have it load a new version each time? I google it, and all these crazy javascripts for bypassing the cache come up. I’m experiencing some caching problems, and I’ve decided to just have it load a new page each time.
Do you mean a link within your own website, or other sites? Because JavaScript can’t help you on other people’s sites.
If it’s other sites, VenusProbe is right, it’s a browser setting. Or, you can hold down your <Shift> key and click on Refresh/Reload in your browser’s toolbar.
Spoke too soon. In the “tracks from our album” section, the first, third and fifth links never display the rollover behavior, but everything else works. I’m using win2k and IE 6.0. Have you tried replacing the musiclink:hover with a rollover event handler?
I can’t get it to recreate your error (Firefox and IE on Win2K). Never had the problem myself, but I have had strange mouseover problems before in IE, and it was down to the format of the CSS tag.
Two things to try:
Change the “musiclink” tags to the following format respectively:
I managed to recreate one link not working after I’d clicked it , because the “active” tag doesn’t tell it to, and the link was left in an active state once it had been clicked (because another page had launched and the browser had re-focussed on it). I recommend you remove the “active” tag altogether; don’t know if this will avoid it, but it isn’t really necessary.
No guarantees that either of these things will work, but worth a try.
BTW, the iFrame and placement of the style instruction shouldn’t make any difference.
Well I’m probably being unfair. I work in corporate websites, and the use of frames is pretty much banned in my world - here’s an edit of an email I wrote to someone recently on the same subject:
Most of these consideration probably don’t apply to your site. As for building it in CSS, I agree - nightmare. Personally I’d use tables and just repeat the tableset per page - once the images are cached it shouldn’t take too long to load in - but I’m probably a bit old-skool.
Having said all that, it looks great (as did your last one). Do you do the graphics too?