Warning: spoilers galore below.
I have to admit that the possibility of that sequence of events hadn’t occurred to me - and only partly because I would have to acquire a cat first.
Anyway, it’s three hours later. Let’s see if I can sum up my impressions…
Well, that was pretty fucking good.
During the wedding scenes, I kept thinking that this was one of those movies I should have seen when they first came out (and it was, but I have a really good excuse: my development of consciousness was still years away), because I had seen it imitated, lampooned, parodied and referenced to so many times that I couldn’t see the original for what it was. In particular, this applied to Brando’s performance, which has been parodied again and again, so I couldn’t take it seriously. Luckily, that feeling wore off quickly and I could enjoy the rest of the film.
Like, I imagine, most viewers of the film, what I found most interesting was the dichotomy of Vito Corleone and, later, Michael. I don’t think I’ve ever seen the opposites of good and evil shown so well within a single character. Don Corleone is a criminal, a murderer, a thief. He says straight out that he doesn’t care how any man makes a living, with “as long as it doesn’t conflict with his interests” added implicitly. But he is deeply respected, seen as a honourable man and a man of reason, and what does he care about? Honour, respect, good freaking manners, and above all the welfare of his family. Those are things we can all relate to. He is just a man who goes farther than most. Inclination or opportunity?
The movie did a great job at portraying Michael’s slide into darkness, with its completion during the chilling baptism scene, where he speaks of renouncing Satan and his works (speaking for the baby, sure, but it’s no coincidence that they have the same name) while a dozen murders are carried out at his command. After that, the final scene where he lies to his wife and then is greeted as Don Corleone merely accentuates the theme.
I did miss a couple of things. I wish there had been a scene after the death of Apollonia, somehow showing the hardening of Michael due to that event. At the very least, I would have liked to see some vengeance taken out on Fabrizio. Also, I can’t quite figure out some details of the timeline. Michael spent enough time in Sicily to court Apollonia, marry her and see her murdered. When he meets Kay, he claims to have been back for a year, but if that is true and if Connie’s baby is the one she was pregnant with when Sonny beat up her husband, that must have been the longest recorded pregnancy in the history of mankind.
These are minor quibbles, though, and the very fact that I am bothering to mention them is an indication of the movie’s greatness more than anything else. With a bad movie, there is not much point to bitch about a single little scene you wish had been in there.
I’ll have to watch it again. It’s a strong 4/5 right now, but I think it’ll pop right up to a 5 on a rescreening. And then, on to Godfather II, I guess. After that, I’ll have to follow Liberal’s implicit advice and do nothing but watch old classics until I’ve seen them all… just in case there’s a graveling in my toilet.
[sub]What the hell is a graveling? And what is it doing in my toilet?[/sub]