Still not sure what it was. Gotta get used to my new schedule.
Apologies for not voting. Just a lack of available time. I hope to get some time in to do a proper read up.
Hmmm what would be the view on a companion thread with links to Day One start post, Night one start post etc? Navigating this beast isn’t going to get any easier.
We haven’t usually done this in the past, and with another thread(the discussion one) going, I’m not sure if the mods will approve it.
Having said that, perhaps someone could create an open Google Doc with that info. for us? Not my are of expertise and so forth, but it would be cool.
Please don’t.
God invented bookmarks for a reason.
It wouldn’t be difficult, nor I think problematic, to include said links in a signature file.
Ask and you shall recieve. (Also anyone feel free to tell me if you can’t access or I’ve flubbed up a link).
http://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key=0ApvweZtrgRBudEppNEdCV0lod1FzTDljWUdrU1c1S2c&hl=en
Very cool, Red. Thanks for that.
Hey sach, did peeker have any powers? Was he vanilla? I assume that blue means Town?
With the typical dispatching of peekercpa complete, the night progressed as everyone expected. Some took to drink, others went to bed, still others toiled through the night, and one died.
NAF1138 (Mormon) is dead.
It would be the Mormon. DUM DUM DUM DUM DUM DUM DUM!
So I’m assuming both our deaths were Town? I’m curious about what Rysto asks.
Anyway, I’ll start off today with my vote.
Vote Meeko
Why? For your justification that Kelly due to the numbers couldn’t be scum again.
Why, in your opinion, is this scummy?
NAF, sorry to see you go. That confirms that misspelling is not a scum tell, at least. 
It’s really bad reasoning–Kelly being scum in a past game has no bearing on whether or not he’ll be scum here. It just struck me as someone trying to protect a fellow scum.
That’s a gigantic reach, Freudian. It’s bad reasoning, sure. But you’re asserting that Meeko knew that it’s bad reasoning but thought that nobody would notice. Anybody who knows why that was poor reasoning would know that they couldn’t possibly sneak that argument past us.
Why are you, for second Day running, going after an easy target?
Vote Freudian
I wasn’t the only one going after Meeko yesterday. A lot of other people thought the reasoning behind Kelly not being able to be scum was bad, too. It just makes me why does Meeko feel he has to protect Kelly like that?
The reasoning was bad. That doesn’t make it scummy.
Bah. I haven’t been killed on night one in a while.
No spoilers for now. I might change my mind in a Day or two.
Did anyone vote for Meeko for making that comment? I do know it pinged a few of us. I remember there being 2 very odd statements from Meeko back to back (the other being his comment on peeker “I half want to vote Peeker just to shut his smug rear end up”)’
Given that Meeko did not understand the fallacy in his thinking (and that should be a given because otherwise he wouldn’t have stated it)
-
He’s Town who felt that the votes on Kelly were undeserved, and made a bad argument.
-
He’s Scum and saw a Scum buddy taking some heat. I’ve had the privlege of seeing Meeko in action as Scum in the 2 games he’s been Scum (one as a teammate and one as a mod.) During those games, Meeko had a shaky at best grasp on the concept of allowing a Scumbuddy to die to serve the greater good. I can see him making a move to protect a Scumbuddy.
I’m hesitant to vote at this point, but the pinging is still there.
I think it was bad reasoning in a desperate attempt to keep a fellow scum out of the noose. I don’t see why he’d make such a bad argument unless he had a vested interest in keeping Kely safe.