Rash Limbaugh IS a big fat idiot!

You must have much respect for the terrorists, then. They don’t follow any rules, and they fight by the credo “then so be it”.

If we can’t find this war without sinking to the level of our enemies, then we’ve already lost.

So let me get this straight - it’s not only acceptable but essential to sexually abuse prisoners of war? Blimey. What sort of weird wars have you read about? Do you think you could explain how such abuse helps prevent insurgency, when the objects of the abuse are already in custody? Just for reference, you understand - I wouldn’t want to find myself in a war situation and miss out on sticking something up the crucial arse that could win the war for my country. Heck, if only I kept a ready supply of butt plugs on me I could probably have brought about world peace by now. Okay, so everyone would be constantly fidgeting and all furniture would have to be replaced with beanbags, but the opportunity seems too good to miss.

Now that you mention it, Linda Lovelace was in Deep Throat, Deep Throat ratted out Richard Nixon and led to the fall of a Republican government, the imposition of Jimmy Carter, the crypto-Iranian Commie, who had sex will Bill Clinton on a federally funded Mapplethorpe-style Britney Spears video clip! It all comes together! Like Jimmy, Bill and Britney.

Nothing is ‘fair’ in love or war, so if you are smart, you will do what is needed to win.

Germans built lots of military and military related plants near civilian areas during WW2? Tough shit. We got rid of both the plants and the civilian areas. Japanese didn’t want to surrender according to our terms? We developed new and exciting ways to remove their cities from this mortal coil. And we won. No doubt. No questioning the outcome, ala’ the Korean War, Vietnam, etc.

It is suicidal for America to blindly follow the GCW, while the enemy is not bound by such constraints.

We need to set a goal, and then do whatever is needed to achieve that goal. Anything less is a total waste of everybodies time, money, and some peoples lives. After all, what war has ever been successfully prosecuted while strictly adhering to the GCW?

What I think of them is irrelevant. Counter-insurgency campaigns are fought with the carrot and the stick. The ‘carrot’ is the reconstruction and aid money that we are passing around. The ‘stick’, when not up some road-side bombers ass, is the threat of overwhelming force, liberally applied when and where needed.

Any other pathetic slogans to whip out?

Brutus, if raping a guy with a stick is OK in order to win a war, what else is? How about we shoot him in the head? Or why don’t we cut off his head?

What if that guy is innocent of anything insurgency-related, since there was a 70-90% chance he was? Why don’t we just grab a bunch of Iraqi men, women and children, line them up and systematically rape them all with a chemical light? Fuck, if he’s innocent anyway, why don’t we just line up a bunch of Americans, or Japanese, or Australians, or Zimbabweans and rape them? That’d sure teach them not to fucking mess with the Coalition of the Willing!

Brutus, you are fucking scum.

Yep. “Be careful what you wish for–you may get it” (stuck up your own ass). :wally

Now, before any mod takes offense, I simply mean that the doofuss who suggested that sticking things up the ass of his enemy was OK might wish to reconsider that when soldiers fighting for HIS side get their asses so invaded. But maybe that’s the price of freedom in his world.

It ain’t in mine.

Jesus fucking Christ. I knew Brutus was a fucking stupid asshole but I didn’t know he was this much of a fucking stupid asshole.

Hey, Brutus, you fucking mouth breather, here’s a few thoughts for your dumb ass to chew on:

  • Most of the detainees at Abu Ghraib were INNOCENT, you fucking moron. 70-90% were arrested by mistake.

  • The military has acknowledged that no useful intelligence was obtained from the torture tactics.

  • One of the torture victims was a TWELVE YEAR OLD GIRL, you fucking worthless, piece of shit scumbag. Are you REALLY a fucking sociopath or are you just pretending for effect?

  • Your whole stupid fucking argument is based on a bullshit false dilemna- i.e the completely false presumption that a war cannot be won without following the Geneva Convention. That assertion is complete crap and so everything that follows from it is also crap.

  • The way we treat POWs is a statement about how we want OUR POWs treated by the enemy. When you torture them, you’re making a statement that it’s ok for them to torture us. Why do you want to torture Americans you unpatriotic, sick fuck?

  • Your own fucking president who you worship has condemned the attrocities at AG. Is GWB fucking full of shit? Is he a coward that doesn’t have what it takes to fight a war? Was he right or wrong to apologize?

_ Don’t forget that we invaded Iraq illegally and under false pretenses in the first place. The war was completely unnecessary to the defense of the US and it was never necessary to capture or torture anyone because IRAQ WAS NOT A FUCKING THREAT TO US!

  • Suck my fucking dick.

Diogenes, you are a simple and stupid little person.

Alleged. That you are willing to take the testimony of prisoners at face value is telling. Don’t forget, you idiots were crying about ‘gang rape’ at the prison, when it turns out to have been some hungarian porno. You need to recognize that you are weak-minded, and should not readily accept everything that is spoon-fed to you.

Really? Then you could name one war that was fought fully within the constraints of the GCW, and was won? Nah, you can’t. Because the GCW are a nuetering force on military action.

Real cute with the ‘unpatriotic’ bit. Of course, I am not the one fervently wishing for American failures abroad, just to justify a sick political agenda.

Hey, such things aren’t talked about. Since someone ratted out our troops, we need to ‘act nice’ for a bit. PR.

I just vote every 4 years. The hero-worship I leave to the idiot left, with their idolization of terrorists (pardon, ‘freedom fighters’).

He can’t help himself.

He’s a fucking knuckle dragging idiot.

He probably has an SS uniform hanging in his closet.

Nothing quite like the moral majority weighing in.

Tell me please when has torture helped the USA win a war?

Potius mori quam foedari

Cite for me or anyone else being taken in by the fake gang bang photos? The first I heard of them was after they’d already been debunked.

None of the photos or allegations from Iraq have been contested by the military or the government. If the allegation about the 12 year old girl is false then why hasn’t the government said so since that is one of the most damaging allegations in this whole sordid scandal?

Your assertion is that it’s impossible to win without violating the GC. hat contention is bullshit. Just because we have cheated doesn’t mean we have to cheat.

Cite for me or anyone else hoping for “American failures abroad?”

It’s interesting that in your fevered universe opposition to unjustified wars = “sickness.”

This is so sick and twisted and vile that I have no response. It speaks for itself.

Good lord, is that the best you can do for a strawman? “Idolization of terrorists?” Why don’t you just throw feathers at me?

Brutus has no idea what honor is.

Funny that you should quote Latin. The Romans had rather ‘interesting’ ways of dealing with prisoners as well, did they not? (When they took them, that is.)

Brutus-then answer me this-what makes us ANY BETTER than they are?

How are WE the good guys? What makes the US superior then, if, when it comes to war “whatever works, anything goes, knock yourself out.”?

I also don’t understand Brutus’s argument about WWII at all. So in WWII we (at times) bombed population centers of a nation at war, knowing that civilian casualties would result. So did the other side. We felt this was necessary to winning the war. History tends to agree.

At no point in WWII did we, AFAIK, torture and sexually humiliate German or Japanese prisoners.
For that matter, My Lai didn’t in any way help us win the Vietnam War, did it?

Please explain how our odds of winning either the War On Terror, or, for that matter, the current War In Iraq (bearing in mind that it’s not quite clear what “winning” would be in either case) are improved by ass-raping helpless prisoners.

(Note that I’m conceding that there might be times when violoating the Geneva Convention would be, in some way, the right thing to do. But there’s a very high threshhold of necessity in those situations…)

Now, wait a minute folks, maybe ol’ Brutus is on to something here.

All along we’ve been spending billions on high-tech aircraft, smart bombs, naval vessels and Humvees, when all we really needed was to equip our fighting forces with enough chemical light sticks to shove up the asses of anyone who stands between us and national security, world peace and the free marketplace.

Please, dear Brutus, explain this master plan of yours: How can glow-in-the-dark butt plugs win the war against terrorism for us?

Jane, you ignorant slut.

At the risk of redundancy, I posted something much like this elsewhere. Persons abnormally sensitive to tedium are excused.

In the Japanese-Russian War, the Japanese astonished the world with thier treatment of wounded prisoners. It was common practice for a Japanese soldier to “adopt” a wounded Russian to nurse back to health. When letters from the Russian soldiers reached the press, the world gaped in awe at the strict civility of Japanese troops. And the Japanese kicked Russia’s butt briskly.

It is, of course, impossible to quantify such results as international prestige and respect. It is also impossible not to regret that Japan’s civility was so short lived.

But you asked only for a war successfully fought by civilized means.

Quod erat demonstrum, as they say in Lubbock.

‘At times’? Come on now.

And I have yet to see evidence of proper ‘torture’ of Iraqi prisoners. But in the sort of counter-insurgency that we are fighting, some humiliation+word of mouth can go a long way, especially with people who are so hopped up on their own little brand of ‘honor’.

That is sort of my point, but I say the threshold should be much lower. If the troops who are actually fighting this war think that doing this or that will help them, then so be it. It is silly for people back in America to expect the troops to not only win the war, but to fight it as those sitting around in comfortable environs want it to be fought. Let the military decide.
And Diogenes, there are all sorts of people of your type that want to see America fail.