Recommend a Dog Breed

Go to a dog show.

Talk to breeders.

Ask them about the breed they have.

See them in action.

Your list is easily satisfied by a fairly large number of dog breeds. It’s all a matter of what you want to do with your dog, and what you’re willing to put up with.

Hang around the Obedience ring, not just the show ring. Dogs in the Obedience ring are usually of breeds that are easier to train. Look for an AKC or UKC show that has both conformation and obedience going on that day. Hang around the rings, hang around where the breeders are, and ASK QUESTIONS.

Elly n ’ the dawgs

Tollers and Aussies.

Both high energy breeds, both shed buckets. Very intelligent, easy to train, but in need of “something to do.” If you don’t have the time to exercise an Aussie, don’t even bother. They require a lot of time and input - unless you find one from a strong show line that’s far more laidback than the average.

I own one of each - see them at http://zappuppy.tripod.com/zap.html

They’re both lovely breeds. Tollers are harder to come by simply because they are rather rare in the US. Both breeds do like to bark, and they do have good watchdog capabilities. Tollers scream - a nifty breed trait - when they want something Baaaad. Both breeds make good agility dogs, if you’re into doggy sports.

Definately talk to breeders, especially once you’ve narrowed it down to a specific breed. Most breeders seem to work extrememly hard to match dogs with owners that will be a good fit.

One thing you might want to keep in mind: In my experience a dog’s intelligence is a good indicator of how much time you’re going to have to spend keeping the dog happy. For example, if your dog can open the fridge, you’re going to have to child-proof it (and low cupboards, too) or keep an eye on the kitchen since a 24/7 dog buffet is not good. A good breeder will know her pups so well she’ll have an idea of how curious and dextrous each one is.

Also, with as much prep work you’re doing, you should be commended. Your hard work will insure you start off with a dog that you will have a high chance of co-habiting with very well. However, getting a dog is an adventure because each one is an intersection of personality and breed characteristics. It’s the proverbial roller-coaster ride – open yourself up to the fun & magic of the chaos.

As a side note, when I decided to get my own dog, I wanted one that wasn’t overly smart. I fell in love with a largish-hound, Springer Spaniel mix. She didn’t show any signs of being the Einstein of the dog world in the short time she was at the shelter. However, not only can she open the fridge, she can escape from a collapsable wire crate WHILE leaving it standing & all sides & doors in-tact. I think she has retractable opposable thumbs. I have to watch her ALL THE TIME when I’m home, and have to crate her when I’m not. She’s worth it, though.

I am kinda surprised that Lissa hasn’t stopped by to cast her vote for adopting a dog from a shelter or pound. She is a passionate voice for dogs who cannot speak for themselves! As she isn’t here yet, I will say it on her behalf- please look into adopting a dog from a shelter if you can.

Indeed…some truly fantastic dogs can be found in a shelter. Purebred dogs that would cost you hundreds if not thousands of dollars to buy. If you don’t care about having ‘papers’ for your dog to show or breed a shelter is a great start (and you won’t breed a dog from a shelter as they insist on spaying/neutering whatever you get). You can usually spot a purebred dog even though you won’t be 100% certain it is.

Or, if you decide on a particular breed, you might check with rescue organizations devoted to that particular breed. You won’t find them for every breed but they’re worth a shot as well.

I wholeheartedly support shelters (have volunteered for them in the past and am actually in the process of starting to volunteer for one again). I would have gotten my dog from a shelter but I was set on my particular breed and they are so rare at this point the chances of finding one in a shelter was near zero so a breeder was my only real choice.

Okay all you sheltie lovers, remember the OP doesn’t want a dog that barks or one that sheds profusely! Don’t get me wrong, I have 2 shelties and they are the loves of my life. I will never have another breed. They are easy to train, they are cute, they are smart, they do well in a townhouse (though I wouldn’t have them in a small apartment if you don’t walk them several times a day), they are extrememly respectful and submissive, and they are playful! They are wonderful, fantastic dogs.

But they bark and they shed! Oh boy, do they bark and shed! Mine know the “quiet” command–but they don’t know any “don’t bark until I tell you to” command. “Quiet” last about 5 minutes, then they’re off barking again. I’ve had shelties all my life. Some have been more prone to barking than others–but all have been quite fond of the sounds of their own voices! As for the shedding, that darn undercoat comes out in buckets! I brush and brush and it seems to spontaneously regenerate! I have them clipped each spring in puppy cuts, and the groomer removes about a pillow case from each dog!

As for basengis, we had one when I was growing up and my brother now has 2. I didn’t notice these dogs being particularly destructive. They can be trained, but they seem much more independent than other dog breeds. They’re great dogs when they are trained, but it’s a bit more of a challenge with them. Also, just because they don’t bark doesn’t mean they’re silent. They make this howling/yodeling sound. It can be quite disconcerting the first time you hear it. Your neighbors sometimes think you’re beating the poor dog!

I still say smooth collie (a short haired version of the more familiar rough collie). They have a lot in common with australian shepards or border collies in that they’re herding dogs that are easily trained. They are more energetic than, say, a greyhound. But 2-3 times daily walking and a fenced yard should suit them. They are generally very gentle and respectful of you. And they don’t have all that rough collie fur (though even short-haired dogs will shed as others have noted). They do bark, but they’re not as notorious a barker as, well, shelties!

They can be shy with strangers though. If you’re looking for a dog that will interact with your guests and respond well to attention from strangers, they’re not the best breed for you.

As for the male vs. female thing, look more to the temperment of the individual puppy rather than chose one on the basis of sex. My male dog is by far the more submissive of my two. The female is definitely dominant over him (though she’s never challenged me once). My mother always said that male dogs wander more, but I never found that to be the case in my experience.

Look into some Alaskan breeds, I had an Alaskan wolfhound once. Beautiful dog, kind and lovable. Very intelligent and quiet.
The dog simply could not bark. He would howl a little bit sometimes but other than that he never made a sound.

He did shed his coat but it wasn’t a continuous shedding. I’d hose him off in the yard and brush him down every now and then.

and he loved tuna fish…well any fish for that matter. He would actually catch fish to eat when I’d take him to the lake.

Re: Britneys and Corgis

Mr. Armadillo’s uncle has a britney who doesn’t so much stand as… levitate. It seems as though the energy contained in her lil frame cannot always be used up by the constant “motion” and “excercise” she partakes in, no, she is sometimes actually pushed into the air and hovers due to the sheer force of the energy vibrations surging through her orange and white self. Ahem. What I meant to say, is that she has a high energy level.
In regards to the corgi, I managed a pet store/grooming shop for three years, in that span of time, the only breeds of dog from whom I had to consistently dodge bites were Australian caggle dogs and corgis. It wasn’t the pit bulls, rotties, gsds, dobies, or any other “horror story” breeds, but almost every single Queensland or corgi that came in the door took a swipe at any employee that tried to touch them. Particularly when it came to clipping nails–for some reason, they really hate to have their paws handled, and we ultimately had to adopt a policy of muzzling any corgi that came in for a nail trim or bath. They seemed like very nice dogs otherwise, and great with their owners, but woe to anyone who invaded their personal space.

Peace,
~mixie

This describes our old Brit to a T. I mean, that was exactly the way he was. Constant energy.

This is so funny! Our Corgis are like this too! No, they don’t bite us, but they DO NOT like to have their paws handled. Every vet we have taken them too has commented that Corgis do not like to have their feet touched. Many times when I have talked to other Corgi owners they have the same experience. I wonder what it is? Why would one breed of dog have such footsie sensitivity? I don’t know the answer, but I will confirm your observation. Still, they are wonderfuly sweet dogs, but God help you if you touch their feet! :slight_smile:

I think the dog for the original poster is a Rottweiler. Very friendly, funloving, loyal dogs.

What do people in here think about them?

Sorry, the Original Poster’s husband hates Rottweilers. And no, he can’t be reasoned with on the matter.

How could anyone hate a Rottweiler? I was thinking of getting one myself. What are their negative traits?

OK.

My advice is unlike other people’s advice in here, in that I would stay away from getting a hard to find pure bred dog like a corgi, basenji, etc.

I wouldn’t get a hyper work needing dog like an austrailian shepherd or collie. These dogs need work to do and room to run, IMO.

I wouldn’t even get a really large dog unless you have an acre or so for it to run. I think having a large dog in an urban type place is a little cruel, but that’s my opinion. You didn’t specify where exactly you live and if you can give the dog room to run, or it will be leashed or chained up.

Two common easy to get dog breeds are a cockapoo (very loyal and intelligent) and a cocker spaniel. These dogs, from what I know are somewhat inside dogs in that they don’t need to be outside all the time (but on the other hand I can’t understand people “crating” a dog for much of the day, seems cruel to me).

They are small enough to bring to work, which is what I think you said you wanted to do.

If I were you I’d go to a pound and get a medium sized cocker spaniel like dog. Pound dogs are unlikely to be pure breed but you can surmise their personalities from the breeds from which they descended and also from going for a short walk with them. I think it’s almost inexcusable for someone with no “need” for a purebred (and most people don’t need a purebred) to buy one and condemn another dog to death. Again, my opinion.

I am never going to understand this notion that all large dogs need to be constantly outside and/or have “room to run.”

All dogs, large or small, need training and exercise of some sort, preferably under supervision–in a fenced area. None of the neighbors, whether right next door or a half a mile away, want the dog, or his poop, in their yard.

I believe it is temperament, not size, which will tell a person what kind of living conditions a dog needs.

I had pound puppies throughout my childhood and young adulthood. The last one we got was, we were assured, an Irish setter mix. She turned out to be a Vizsla mix–very strong on the Vizsla.

I think it’s great when people take in rescues, puppies or otherwise, whether purebred or not. There can sometimes be concerns with past history, health and temperament with a rescue.
IMHO, it is smart to choose a dog, whether from a responsible breeder or pound, which you can be reasonably sure will be a healthy and happy pet. Caveat emptor.

Hear, hear. Not every large dog needs constant motion and a job to do–in fact, many of the giant breeds are more couch potatoey than smaller breeds. I guarantee you any Australian shepherd, border collie, Queensland heeler, or britney (all medium sized dogs) needs far more exercise and stimulation than your average great dane, greyhound, or Irish wolfhound. It’s not the size of the house or yard that you have that matters, it’s how dedicated you are to raising your dog properly.

One of the breeders of Giant Schnauzers I’ve been talking to has said that between a person living in an apartment who’s willing and happy to take their dog out and run five miles, or a person who lives in a huge house on tons of land with the plan of just turning the dog loose and letting it get it’s own exercise, that she’d pick the apartment dweller every time. And that’s for a Giant Schnauzer.

If I hear one more person say it’s “cruel” to have a large dog living in an apartment or a house with a small yard, I’m going to… well, do something creative and painful to them.

~mixie

I still think it’s cruel. Especially if a dog is by itself. There is a family around here that keeps it’s dog in a 10’ by 10’ pen 24/7. No exercise, ever.

Even if they did give it 1/2 hour of exercise a day, dogs are social animals, no? How would you like to be cooped up all day?

At least if you let it run wild (around here in the country) it can hang out with other dogs and whatnot during the day.

I think we are talking about two entirely separate things here. I’m talking about being a responsible pet owner, exercising and spending time with your dog whether that be in the mornings and evenings when you’re not at work, or if you happen to be so fortunate, throughout the day. Whether you have a huge yard or a tiny house, you should never even consider getting a dog if you don’t have the time and energy to devote to it. If that dog was kept in a ten by ten foot pen during the day when his owner was at work, but spent lots of quality time exercising, spending time with, and playing with his dog mornings and evenings, then what’s the problem?

I assure you, that’s a far, far better solution than getting a dog and allowing it to “run wild,” getting hit by cars, wrecking havoc on the local wildlife, breeding indescriminately, catching and spreading diseases, getting in fights with other dogs, killing livestock, killing cats, running away, or all the other 8923489298235 things that happen to dogs that are allowed to “run wild” by irresponsible, lazy owners who can’t be bothered to take responsibility and care for the animals that they have taken into their lives.

Sure, dogs are social animals. Therefore, don’t get one if you don’t have the time, desire, and energy to spend time with your dog.*

Anyway, enough with the hijack.

Peace,
~mixie

*all references to “you” and “your” in the above statement are strictly general and not meant to refer directly to the quoted poster.

Um, no, you wouldn’t. Not if you were me. I already said I’ve owned cockers and am not looking for another. Even though I loved mine to pieces and thought they were excellent dogs. (As to the -like, my neighbor owns several springers and they drive me up a wall with all their barking.)

Why is it inexcusable to own a purebred if that is what one wants? And how, for the love of fudge, does buying a purebred “condemn another dog to death”?! What if I don’t get any dog - does that “condemn another dog to death”? What if I decide to get a cat instead? Can you see what a ridiculous statement that is, so you never again use it to try to guilt-trip someone into not getting the dog that will most make them happy? Please? Thank you.

You are most definitely condemning another dog to death. I’m not laying a guilt trip on you. It’s just factual.

If you get a cat instead or if you don’t get any dog (like me, I’m allergic, but even if I weren’t I might not get one), then is it your fault that a pound dog dies? Well, not really, since there was nothing you could have done to prevent it other than adopt the pound dog, and you wanted a cat.

There are 1M pound dogs available and no purebred dogs available at all. You go to a purebred dealer and they agree to have one and only one dog made for you. Just for you! Well, fine, but instead of there being 999,999 pound dogs now, there are 1M still.

If you buy a purebred you are adding to the purebred demand and that dog will be replaced via another litter.

If you get a pound dog instead then that’s one less purebred dog demanded.

If you think in macroeconomic terms, then it makes perfect sense.
Now is it your fault that the dog dies? Not really, but if everything else is equal you might as well get a pound dog.

I’ll use that analogy any time I want and other people probably will to as I’ve heard it many times before. It makes perfect sense.

No, it does not. Your logical error is glaring; surely I’m not the only one who sees it…

First of all,

isn’t how it works at all! I don’t know of anyone who “makes” dogs “to order”. One does contact a breeder to find out if they have litters planned; the breeder doesn’t plan litters to order. He or she does so because it fits in their plan for that bitch or dog. Ask a breeder if you want more detail.

For that matter,

isn’t true, either. Do you honestly believe that, right now, there are no purebred dogs available to anyone to buy and/or rescue or adopt? That the only way one can get a purebred dog is by your (imaginary) “made-to-order” scheme? Oh, somebody help me, please!!!

For the last time, there is no logical relationship between what kind of dog I purchase and any given dog (or all of them!) in an animal shelter being euthanized. It’s a non sequiter. The only person responsible for Dog X dying is the irresponsible person who didn’t spay or neuter their pet and let it produce unwanted litters, or the irresponsible person who got a dog for the wrong reasons and then abandons it or dumps it at the shelter. That will continue to go on no matter what I do! Until people are better educated about spaying and neutering, and more responsible in their pet ownership, it will continue forever.

It sounds as if you are advocating the elimination of all purebred dogs unless and until there are no more unwanted dogs in the world. By then, all those wonderful, diverse breeds will be gone forever!

By the way, do you feel it’s fair for anyone to have children of their own, or are they also morally obligated to adopt a child that someone else didn’t want first? Yes, I realize it’s not the same. Just extending your argument to ridiculous lengths to show how foolish it is.