Unless I’m mistaken, it means that he thinks you and Rubystreak are acting like pre-teen girls at a day-camp, backing up the popular kid (in this case Jodi) in an immature quarrel where every little girl has to be on one side or the other (and in this instance The Second Stone personifies the other side). Only, he’s giving you a pass out of sympathy for your crappy year.*
Thus compounding the insultingness (and idiocy) of his behavior, IMHO.
Love to be wrong about this, The Second Stone. Please advise.
*{{{{{{jsgoddess}}}}}}, btw, in case I missed it before.
Nothing, it means I should not have responded to your over the top and insane rants on behalf of someone who specifically said she did not want an apology. If you always call strangers who don’t like lawyers (in general) insane, idiot, arrogant horrid people, than I retract my retraction. I was wrong to rise to your bait for the reason that you are very vulnerable, same as Guin. I should not have responded in kind to either of you.
What happened is that I took a shot at lawyers in general, Jodi took a shot at me in particular, I responded to her insult with a joke about bestiality and she left it. You and Rubystreak (and Kaylasdad) kept on keeping on after that, apparently feeling safe in hiding behind Jodi’s skirts, who had more sensibly than any of us, left and not come back. But I’ve never disputed that I’m an idiot.
Unless I’m mistaken, it means that he thinks you and Rubystreak are acting like pre-teen girls at a day-camp, backing up the popular kid (in this case Jodi) in an immature quarrel where every little girl has to be on one side or the other (and in this instance The Second Stone personifies the other side). Only, he’s giving you a pass out of sympathy for your crappy year.*
Thus compounding the insultingness (and idiocy) of his behavior, IMHO.
Love to be wrong about this, The Second Stone. Please advise.
You are as big a fool as anyone else in this thread. I would definitely include you in the pre-teen girl category. But yes, you interpreted the scenario correctly. But I should warn you that another thing I learned at that day camp was that little girls in threes eventually decide to cut one out, as cruelly as possible. You little girl you.
Well, as the father of a twelve-year old girl, let me assure you that you haven’t given me any information I didn’t already have. I can see you’re a little beleaguered at the moment, so I think I will follow Jodi’s excellent example and allow the focus of this thread to revert to its rightful subject, Mr. Rand Rover. I’ll be seeing you around, I hope in a better mood.
Twit.
Speaking of Rand Rover, on reconsideration, I should never have questioned his credentials in law. I am ignorant of the demands of any degree in law or of the practice of law itself. I think his constant negative and critical comments (not to me, but to Dopers in general) set me off. That’s a reason, but not an excuse. My apologies to Rand.
Apology not accepted. You are scum and vermin. If you think I’m going to help you feel better about your stupid ass self by accepting your apology and pretending everything is peaches and cream then you’ve got another think coming.
Yeah, I’m thinking of starting a thread about Rand Rover deriding him for. . . something. I want to be able to say I started a long thread. And the beauty of it is that Rand Rover does all the work keeping it alive. And the other people get to take out more hostility on him. It’s a win all the way around.
WTF, Stone? Where does this idea come from that I’m all vulnerable and delicate? You can take your protection and shove it up your ass sideways.
And Ruby doesn’t need me to run over and defend her honor. I already post over at Giraffe’s board. And I don’t think he appreciates you trying to start board wars.
It’s not against his rules. And you appear to be somewhat disturbed. Frankly I was worried after my awful posts about you that you might hurt yourself. You seem suicidal. Oh, and you may have the honor of pushing RR’s pit over to 13 unlucky pages.