Relative asks for money all the time...but she tithes every month

Catholics don’t have a strict tradition of tithing. I would be surprised to learn she is Catholic.

Until I read this, I had forgotten about the employee who killed his family.

I still kind of like seeing her interviewed. Go figure.

Cut her off.

Maybe “Oh What a Friend We Have In Jesus” is in her Hymnal. Chapter 7.

If she was active in a local church, my response would be different.

I ahd to Google Joyce Meyer Ministries. What I found suggests that your close relative needs the money much more than JM Minsitries. I second cutting her off.

Lol, good point.

If she’s borrowing from you, she clearly doesn’t have an income. 10% of $0 is $0. She should be tithing $0.

That’s what I was thinking, looking at the title of this thread again - giving money to a scam artist isn’t tithing, in my opinion.

I’ve heard of some prosperity churches that tell you that if you loose your job or otherwise have a reduction in income, that’s the time to start double tithing.

There’s piety, there’s sharing, and there’s hopeful wishing for magic. If you’re hopefully wishing for magic income and you go to a regular church, you might find that the people there discourage that. It can be deflating. To keep the magic going, you might want to avoid a regular church.

Yep - I’ve heard that one too - Kenneth Copeland I think.

you have every right not to give a gift based on knowing how it’s likely to be spent.

The OP’s cousin has every right to tithe, and the OP has every right not to fund it.

The IRS found that 87% of donations went towards outreach programs to spread religious doctrine, and allowed them to keep their tax-exempt status. So, at most 13% of her tithes are going to the excesses mentioned above.

The rest is going to spreading what I consider to be mythology, but my opinion on that is irrelevant. It certainly does irk me that people get rich doing this kind of “charity” work.

Are you lending or giving money to her? If you’re lending my up-front policy is that I won’t lend any more until I’m paid back. If you’re giving money to her I’d just tell her if she has enough money to tithe then you shouldn’t need to give her money. I’d suggest she adjust her tithing, and you shouldn’t feel bad about it.

If I didn’t have a conscience I’d love to get rich this way.

Once after reading about all these TV evangelists I said I had missed my calling. My sister said you don’t even believe in God. I said I don’t have to, all I have to do is convince the people who do that God wants me to have their money.
Those people know exactly what they are doing.

Don’t blame them for their blessings!

:wink:

Sigma, you totally did the right thing.

Unless you know exactly how the IRS works this out, I think this is naive. Do you know how the IRS decides what is personal spending and what is spending on spreading religious doctrine?

Does the IRS have rules setting maximum limits on how lavish the headquarters of a religious organisation can be before it is considered not part of spreading religious doctrine? Or on how high salaries those who work at the top of such organisations can be before they are no longer part of spreading religious doctrine? Or on how much the organisation can spend on transporting its messiahs around?

I think you will find that the corporate jet counts as spreading religious doctrine. The gold taps in the personal apartments in the new church are part of spreading religious doctrine. The monumental salaries probably paid to Meyer and her family are part of spreading religious doctrine.

All the work of Meyer’s church is likely to count as “spreading religious doctrine” as far as the IRS is concerned. That means that most likely pretty much everything that the church spends is covered. And given that Meyer’s church is likely to revolve almost entirely around Meyer, and Meyer’s life is inextricably wound up with her church, I expect pretty much everything she uses, lives in etc counts as “spreading religious doctrine”.