Reuters Stands by Iraq Abuse Reports, Releases Timeline on Incident
Dick Cheney remembered where he hid the C4 just before his last bypass made him forget everything?
No doubt the investigation was conducted by RUC on loan…
Sleep deprivation and “stress induction” (nice euphamism) are torture techniques. Just because they’re “standard” doesn’t mean they’re not torture techniques.
I see. The military has cleared itself. They asked the perps if they did it and they said no. That’s good enough for me. Not.
Can we start calling him Maj. Gen. Ricardo “Dirty” Sanchez now?
Sometimes it’s hard to believe the length people will go to, to defend human rights abuses, provided of course that those abuses are committed by US citizens.
From Amnesty International
Rush Limbaugh has taken to caling these things “traditional interrogation methods.”
I laughed so hard that I literally did spew on my keyboard.
82nd Airborne investigation summary
Executive summary of an 82nd Airborne Division investigation into the alleged treatment of Reuters Journalists by soldiers in the division.
28 JAN 04
REUTERS/NBC EMPLOYEE DETENTION EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This investigation was appointed by the Commanding General, 82d Airborne Division on 10 January 2004, after receipt of allegations in a letter from Reuters dated 9 January 2004. Previous to this investigation, an inquiry was conducted into the propriety of detaining 4 Iraqis on 2 January 2004 who claimed to be employees of the press. The results of previous inquiries into the facts and circumstances leading to the detention of three Reuters and one NBC employee have been considered and included in this report of investigation. Likewise, the information received from Reuters dated 16 January 2004, including detailed statements of three Reuters employees, have been considered as part of this investigation. A similar request for information directed toward NBC concerning their employee’s involvement and treatment while temporarily detained has not yet been answered or received.
And from a lot of supposed Christians as well. What would Jesus do? He wouldn’t have tortured or countenanced torture of any form from what I’ve heard and was taught about him. Am I wrong?
What do you mean by dietary change? I assume this is more than forcing them to “Do Atkins” for a few days.
Ah. Thanks. To the best of my limited knowledge, that is NOT part of Atkins. (Except for the force-feeding of pork, of course.)
Translation: No pictures or video were taken of the incident.
(trying to recover from an asthma attack brought on by laughter)
That…is…so…WRONG!.. :eek:
Yes you are sadly mistaken. I forgive you since, living in Ireland, you are probably not up to date on the American socio-political climate, but the US government is fulfilling its duty to Jesus with the Iraq invasion.
What a relief to hear this… I felt so utterly dumb… I just didn’t understand why people who got out of Abu Graib said that they were made to denounce Islam and thank Jesus for being alive.
One seems to have been beaten on his broken leg until he cursed Islam.
I say that this is the way to go and proselytize In The Name Of Jesus Our Lord And Saviour.
I’m now sending a US flag to Baghdad decorated with the reveiling message:
At Abu Graib Jesus Saves
Muslims from all over the place
To make them feel fine
We beat them up in line
Christians are so good
Surely they understood.
Salaam. A
Aldebaran, Arnold Winkelried* was being sarcastic with that remark, not serious.
I know … Me too 
But I can imagine that Heavenly Inspired Bush must really be pleased that the US Heros do such a great job in converting the Iraqi Muslims to the Jesus Saves Belief.
Some of them even received baptism with fresh US urine. What more can you expect as a gift to welcome you in the Great Religion of Christ?
Salaam. A