Coldfire
Hostile, unpleasant?..I was just adapting to the SDMB culture. And you are accusing me of what? Flaming in a flame forum? I must have missed the “Posters with less than X posts please roll over and die for regulars” sign. Perhaps it was covered by the “Abandon All Hope” or “Arbeit Macht Frei” signs.
A stern reminder to take it from the regs and say “Thank you sir, may I have another”.
Did you also bring to the “attention of the staff” the threads that introduced me to the SDMB, including a viscious personal attack thread posted about me?
Or is it one of those “all animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others things”
Yes. Yes I did. And I am so clever, so devious, that I can trick people into creating threads just to attack me. Does my cunning and deceit know no end?
Example?
And would you just prefer that I come right out and call people a shithead? It seems to work for many or your regulars here.
No. I post to express an opinion. Is the spectre of trolling going to be raised here?
I bet I know what it is.
Oh, he shoots. He scores.
You know, it’s very sad, I think, that a moderator on the SDMB relegates anyone with an opinion, or anyone that responds in kind as a “troll” and then ignores it when a regular, like Jeff Olsen pretty much admits to trolling?
What could explain that? I think this comes under the rubric of the special SDMB definition of a troll as “anyone whose opinion I don’t like and, converseky, anyone I don’t like with an opinion”
No, but you can accuse me of being a troll because you disagree with me.
Hey, thanks for not taking 200 words to say that.
Which is just a disingenuous way of saying “Don’t disagree with me and, what’s more, don’t defend yourself”.
Why would I do that? You give yourself and the SDMB too much credit. As I said. I only referenced the SDMB twice, once was to counter Jeff Olsen’s (you know, the troll) unequivocal claim that I didn’t own my own site. The other was to use a comment as a starting point.
I think what really bothers Dopers about being referenced on my web site is that you don’t moderate it and don’t control it.
And then the SDMB congratulates itself on running off another newbie and has a celebratory feces flinging fiesta. Then they fall into the more comfortable routine of beating on posters that don’t fight back.
elf6c
Yes, but I aspire to be like you: A conscientious wit and master of scatology.
Jeff Olsen (again)
Jeff, Jeff, Jeff, you spin so much I’m surprised one of your fillings don’t fly out.
Long and short of it: You ended up on a web site that you denied was mine. Just a remarkable co-incidence. Call Unsolved Mysteries.
Diane
Good night Mrs. Kalabash, where ever you are.
jr8
I just finished Jack Finney’s “From Time to Time” the sequel to his 1970 sleeper hit novel “Time and Again”. Good read. One of those books where you don’t want the last page to come. Unfortunately, the subplot about the Titanic seems a little overdone after the 1997 Titanic-mania, even though the book predates that. I also tend to disagree with his premise of the good old days, that the late 19th century was a kinder, gentler time, considering places like Whitechapel and Hell’s Kitchen and having seen turn of the century crime photography. So it’s escapism: Buy the premise, buy the book.