Badly hijacked. Ongoing argument between Libertarian, iampunha, mhendoet al and the aforementioned Reverend Mykeru about whether or not it’s ok to hate people and wish cancer on them. Good guys say no, the clown of the week says yes.
But what’s this? The entirety of his argument seems to be that since Pat Robertson was such a hateful person, and wished death on others, it’s fully justified, defensible, even necessary to wish it on him!
Virtually every post by RM reads as a highlight reel of how to come off as the biggest idiot possible while debating, but one post in particular caught my eye and inspired me to start this thread.
LibertariantoldRM that he was just like Fred Phelps, condemning people he thinks are horrible. RM then takes this characterization, and in response – compares himself to Pat Robertson! The very same Pat Robertson he’s spent the whole thread proving was an irredeemable scumbag! A truly inspired bit of idiocy.
On the contrary, Munch. Your average grade school student would find Mykeru a good introduction to How Not to Debate. A beginning copyeditor would have no trouble at all ficing Mykeru’s broken language into something resembling standard English. A first-year high school student could learn all about how not to write a history paper. Logic students could practice finding holes in arguments.
Think of Mykeru as an all-purpose punching bag. As long as it doesn’t fall on anyone, it’s very useful. Just remember to wear gloves. No need to hurt your hands punching the ever-hating fuckstains out of it.
Sorry to intrude on this Christian Coalition circle-jerk, but…
Interesting board. Because I am not particularly sorry that Pat Robertson has cancer, considering the hateful things he has said and the grotesque scamming of the old and the sick he engages in, I am charged with “advocating cancer” in Pat Robertson.
Then the other thread becomes an exceptionally tedious exercise after another poster invokes Godwin’s Law. Of course, that get hung around my neck. Refer back to my uncharitable comments about Pat Robertson.
Now, a poster starts a thread with no other purpose than ad hominem?
And what’s even more fun is that White Lightning can’t even get it straight.
Oh well…Let’s feed the trolls.
Who wished cancer on Pat Robertson? Certainly not me. I just don’t feel that much sympathy for a faith healer who has siphoned off money from other people’s misery and perhaps shortened their life by having them ignore treatment in leiu of one of his bogus 'cures" and then turns around and instead of praying to Jesus to cure him, as he did for others, he turns to secular medicine.
Well, no. Again, I never wished anything on Pat Robertson. If I had the power to wish anything on him it would be a terminal case of painful rectal itch. It would be far more entertaining to watch.
Which is an intriguing example of my idiocy, since you seem to have invented it from whole cloth.
Hardly. This is the exchange:
Libertarian:
quote:
And you’re just like Fred Phelps.
Me:
You mean the “God Hates Fags” guy that pickets the funerals of people that die of AIDS?
Oh, ok, if you say so, Mr. Analogy
Libertarian:
quote:
He condemns people he thinks are horrible.
Me:
Like, well…Pat Robertson does! More from Pat’s greatest hits:
quote:
The fight for the Equal Rights Amendment in Iowa is about a socialist, antifamily political movement that encourages women to leave their husbands, kill their children, practice witchcraft, destroy capitalism, and become lesbians.
–Pat Robertson, 1992
Libertarian:
quote:
Oh, and you can kiss my presensile rectum.
Now, where did I compare myself to Pat Robertson? I was under the impression that I was comparing Pat Robertson to Reverend Phelps.
No, honestly, I write enough contentious stuff without you having to invent something to take me to task on. But it’s a nice bit of creative writing. I look forward to further examples of your fiction.
Do you mind if I think of you and Munch as two rather sad trolls or, more likely two sock puppets of the same poster?
You two seem to spend a lot of time on “neener-neener” ad hominem about how stupid I am, what a bad debater, etc, but when it comes to substance, the only example of my supposed lack of rhetorical accumen had to be invented.
Interesting. Carry on with you personal vendetta. Just wipe your feet.
Now, I don’t like to make rash accusations, but what the hell, I feel I’ve been accused of being a member of the Christian Coallition and that’s enough to take the gloves off.
One day, as far as I can tell, and about, what, 24 posts to being pitted? I’ve not been around here long, but it looks kind of suspicious to me.
I’ll set aside, for now, the question of how iampunha’s punching bag got fuckstains on it in the first place. That’s probably a thread in itself.
Damn you, Mykeru, you made me post something that made me use a smilie.
‘Christian Coalition circle-jerk’ my fucking foot. Ad hominem. Feed the trolls. You fucking jackass.
The fact that your reasoning is idiotic makes me a Christian? Kiss my ass. This thread wasn’t started to make ad hominems, it was started to give you a place to put your stupidity so that you wouldn’t keep fucking up other people’s threads.
Feed the trolls? I hesitated to start this thread because I didn’t want to encourage you. You spew that kind of crap, get called out for it, respond with this kind of misdirection, and I’m the troll? Please.
Here you go.
Libertarian:
quote:
He condemns people he thinks are horrible.
Me:
Like, well…Pat Robertson does! More from Pat’s greatest hits:
Translation: You condemn people you think are horrible. By your own admission and Lib’s statement. Like Pat Robertson, for example. You think he’s horrible and you condemn him. And then you say that Pat Robertson is horrible because he condemns people he thinks are horrible.
I mind. I don’t know Munch at all, but I’ve been around on these boards for quite a long time and I am here to stand up in iampunha’s defense. He is an outstanding debater, well-read, logical and intelligent and a very much beloved Doper. Quite the opposite of a troll. Your behavior, however, appears much more trollish in nature. Me thinketh thou doth protesteth too much.
Having not read any of the linked threads (beyond a couple posts), I am not remotely interested in the debate at hand. But don’t be callin’ **'Punha **names – he’s one of my favorites on the Boards. (Betcha iampunha had no idea I have a crush on him!) I strongly suggest you lurk a little more and get a more accurate read on Dopers. Have you done a search on **Munch **and 'Punha’s screen names to see other posts of theirs? Before you accuse someone of being a sockpuppet or a troll, I am politely requesting that you dig up some evidence to back yourself up.
Hey, I’ve got a minute. I will just repeat my original statements that lead to such villification:
I have no sympathy for Pat Robertson. As I said, I’m only sorry he has only one prostate to get cancer.
This is not for his religion, or his political views. I doubt the sincerity of either of those convictions takes precedence over right-wing political expediency.
What’s more, the practioners of faith healing that engage is “calling out” and “Word of Knowledge” like Popoff and Grant and Robertson have to know that they are engaging in a scam. They have to acquire information on the audience by subterfuge and then act as those they got it by divine power. Robertson did this sort of thing.
More recently Robertson has simply “shotgunned” claiming over the airwaves that some ill-defined “lady in Cincinnati” is cured of cancer.
However, we can never know how many people thought they were cured by Robertson and then failed to seek or gave up treatment and how this may have lead to death and suffering. However, this sort of occurrence, where people die after taking the “cure” of faith healers is well documented.
And then Pat, when he gets cancer doesn’t pray, he doesn’t turn to faith. No, he used the money he scammed off the sick, old and desperate to but the best secular medicine money can buy.
I have no sympathy. None. I will save it for someone deserving empathy rather than for an ignorant yet cunning human predator.
Wow. It took me like 50 posts before I could bold and quote so well. You certainly seemed to have grasped the subtilties of the board rather quickly. And to jump right into the BBQ? Wow, it’s…it’s…almost like you’ve been here before.
Sorry Rev. I’m not a big fan of Mr. Robertson either. I just couldn’t help but to comment on the appearence of you either being a reincarnation or a sock puppet. You don’t seem shy enough to hide that appearance. For that I am insulted. After all, we’re not ignorant here.
I have some news that you might find shocking. I hope you are sitting. Are you? Are you ready?
The Straight Dope doesn’t have the only forum on the internet.
I know. It blows your fucking mind. But it’s true. One can learn how to quote and post from those other forums, like the one at James Randi’s site (www.randi.org) and the Cyber Soap Box (www.cybersoapbox.com). I even learned vB and UBB code there.
You folks need to get out more. It would cut down on the incest.
You are right. I’m probably not going to be here long. You people are absolute morons.
Oh, blow it out your puckered, paranoid ass. I have posted on the Darwin Awards Forum, The Cyber Soap Box, The JREF forum, plus Snopes, some of them for years using this name. I am just no stranger to forums of the vituperation carried out by inbred little cliques.
I certainly didn’t register my domain www.mykeru.com back in 1998 just so I could have the means to be a sock puppet 5 years later on the Straight Dope.
