Mykeru, again I can’t help but be amused at your characterizations of your opponents (in as much as you’re actually fighting. CRorex’s feces-flinging monkeys do more damage than your posts). To say nothing of my other fellow dopers … the thought that I am now, or have ever been, a member of the Christian Coalition is almost as amusing as is the idea that you think we ought to be insulted by you saying I/we am/are. What next, are you going to accuse us of being conservative? Tell us you hope our tax cuts are small?
The point of an insult is that it’s … wait for it, now…
Supposed to be insulting.
You may want to keep this in mind for future pit threads.
Now then. I would, if I were you, Mykeru, be very careful just where and how I used the word “troll” or the phrase “sock puppet”. (Ab)Use of these terms directed at others (i.e. "You and munch look like/are trolls/sock puppets) is not looked upon terribly well by the moderation/administration of this board. And the last person who maintained that three (if I might, upstanding) screen names belonged to the same person … well, he was banned a long time ago, and IIRC there weren’t many tears shed.
“And, you know, I’m still not sorry Pat Robertson has a malignant gland. And that’s the trouble, isn’t it?”
That’s a manifestation of the disease you’ve brought to this board. Merely a thought. I would say I shudder to think of the others you have, but truth be told you’re just a sad little thing without hands or functioning eyes … else how could you not see you’re getting your ass handed to you in this thread and the other one?
“Do you mind if I think of you and Munch as two rather sad trolls or, more likely two sock puppets of the same poster?”
What I said before. Think what you want, but when you start saying “I think you’re a troll/sock puppet”, you’d better have a lot more going for you than two threads. It’s such an insignificant number of my posts that you might as well say you thought you maybe saw me at some point, or something. You might also want to examine writing styles, not to mention the fact that I’ve disagreed with Munch already IN THIS VERY THREAD!
“You two seem to spend a lot of time on “neener-neener” ad hominem about how stupid I am, what a bad debater, etc, but when it comes to substance, the only example of my supposed lack of rhetorical accumen had to be invented.”
Um, no. The threads in which you have (rather quickly and easily, which made things much easier for all those concerned) displayed your second-grade logic skills are here on this board for anyone to see. The only invention in question is whatever you’re using to turn the shit between your ears into words on a screen.
The circus will probably be calling you about that one, actually. On the internet, nobody knows you’re an elephant.
And now onto something actually worth devoting time:
“He is an outstanding debater, well-read, logical and intelligent and a very much beloved Doper.”
Well, now I know I can smile from ear to ear:D
“But don’t be callin’ 'Punha names – he’s one of my favorites on the Boards. (Betcha iampunha had no idea I have a crush on him!)”
Indeed I had absolutely none. Why didn’t you tell me before?
::is subtly handed a 3*5 index card with the definition of “crush” on it::
Oh. Er, evidently, that is … it seems that once you tell someone you have a crush on them, it isn’t a crush anymore, it’s something else. Makes no sense to me, but I’m getting props in the Pit. Ain’t no way I’m gonna disagree;)
[sub]I’d grope you, but that whole fiancée thing, y’know?;)[/sub]